Calls to `bpf_loop` are replaced with direct loops to avoid
indirection. E.g. the following:
bpf_loop(10, foo, NULL, 0);
Is replaced by equivalent of the following:
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
foo(i, NULL);
This transformation could be applied when:
- callback is known and does not change during program execution;
- flags passed to `bpf_loop` are always zero.
Inlining logic works as follows:
- During execution simulation function `update_loop_inline_state`
tracks the following information for each `bpf_loop` call
instruction:
- is callback known and constant?
- are flags constant and zero?
- Function `adjust_stack_depth_for_loop_inlining` increases stack
depth for functions where `bpf_loop` calls could be inlined. This is
needed to spill registers R6, R7 and R8. These registers are used as
loop counter, loop maximal bound and callback context parameter;
- Function `inline_bpf_loop` called from `do_misc_fixups` replaces
`bpf_loop` calls fit for inlining with corresponding loop
instructions.
Measurements using `benchs/run_bench_bpf_loop.sh` inside QEMU / KVM on
i7-4710HQ CPU show a drop in latency from 14 ns/op to 2 ns/op.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 15 ++
kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c | 9 +-
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 177 ++++++++++++++-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c | 21 ++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop.c | 38 ++++
.../selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c | 206 ++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 457 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index e8439f6cbe57..30f640ecc781 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
#define BPF_MAX_VAR_SIZ (1 << 29)
/* size of type_str_buf in bpf_verifier. */
#define TYPE_STR_BUF_LEN 64
+/* Maximum number of loops for bpf_loop */
+#define BPF_MAX_LOOPS BIT(23)
/* Liveness marks, used for registers and spilled-regs (in stack slots).
* Read marks propagate upwards until they find a write mark; they record that
@@ -344,6 +346,15 @@ struct bpf_verifier_state_list {
int miss_cnt, hit_cnt;
};
+struct bpf_loop_inline_state {
+ u32 initialized:1; /* set to true upon first entry */
+ u32 callback_is_constant:1; /* true if callback function
+ * is the same at each call
+ */
+ u32 flags_is_zero:1; /* true if flags register is zero at each call */
+ u32 callback_subprogno; /* valid when callback_is_constant == 1 */
+};
+
/* Possible states for alu_state member. */
#define BPF_ALU_SANITIZE_SRC (1U << 0)
#define BPF_ALU_SANITIZE_DST (1U << 1)
@@ -380,6 +391,10 @@ struct bpf_insn_aux_data {
bool sanitize_stack_spill; /* subject to Spectre v4 sanitation */
bool zext_dst; /* this insn zero extends dst reg */
u8 alu_state; /* used in combination with alu_limit */
+ /* if instruction is a call to bpf_loop this field tracks
+ * the state of the relevant registers to take decision about inlining
+ */
+ struct bpf_loop_inline_state loop_inline_state;
/* below fields are initialized once */
unsigned int orig_idx; /* original instruction index */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
index d5d96ceca105..cdb898fce118 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate_trace.h>
+#include <linux/bpf_verifier.h>
struct bpf_iter_target_info {
struct list_head list;
@@ -723,9 +724,6 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_for_each_map_elem_proto = {
.arg4_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
-/* maximum number of loops */
-#define MAX_LOOPS BIT(23)
-
BPF_CALL_4(bpf_loop, u32, nr_loops, void *, callback_fn, void *, callback_ctx,
u64, flags)
{
@@ -733,9 +731,12 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_loop, u32, nr_loops, void *, callback_fn, void *, callback_ctx,
u64 ret;
u32 i;
+ /* note: these safety checks are also verified when bpf_loop is inlined,
+ * be careful to modify this code in sync
+ */
if (flags)
return -EINVAL;
- if (nr_loops > MAX_LOOPS)
+ if (nr_loops > BPF_MAX_LOOPS)
return -E2BIG;
for (i = 0; i < nr_loops; i++) {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index aedac2ac02b9..85ee2bd14d55 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -7103,6 +7103,73 @@ static int check_get_func_ip(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
+static struct bpf_insn_aux_data *cur_aux(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
+{
+ return &env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx];
+}
+
+static bool fit_for_bpf_loop_inline(struct bpf_insn_aux_data *insn_aux)
+{
+ return insn_aux->loop_inline_state.initialized &&
+ insn_aux->loop_inline_state.flags_is_zero &&
+ insn_aux->loop_inline_state.callback_is_constant;
+}
+
+/* For all sub-programs in the program (including main) checks
+ * insn_aux_data to see if there are bpf_loop calls that require
+ * inlining. If such calls are found subprog stack_depth is increased
+ * by the size of 3 registers. Reserved space would be used in the
+ * do_misc_fixups to spill values of the R6, R7, R8 to use these
+ * registers for loop iteration.
+ */
+static void adjust_stack_depth_for_loop_inlining(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
+{
+ int i, subprog_start, subprog_end, cur_subprog = 0;
+ struct bpf_subprog_info *subprog = env->subprog_info;
+ int insn_cnt = env->prog->len;
+
+ subprog_start = subprog[cur_subprog].start;
+ subprog_end = env->subprog_cnt > 1
+ ? subprog[cur_subprog + 1].start
+ : insn_cnt;
+ for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++) {
+ if (fit_for_bpf_loop_inline(&env->insn_aux_data[i])) {
+ /* reserve space for 3 registers */
+ subprog->stack_depth += BPF_REG_SIZE * 3;
+ /* skip to the next subprog */
+ i = subprog_end - 1;
+ }
+ if (i == subprog_end - 1) {
+ subprog_start = subprog_end;
+ cur_subprog++;
+ if (cur_subprog < env->subprog_cnt)
+ subprog_end = subprog[cur_subprog + 1].start;
+ }
+ }
+
+ env->prog->aux->stack_depth = env->subprog_info[0].stack_depth;
+}
+
+static void update_loop_inline_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 subprogno)
+{
+ struct bpf_loop_inline_state *state = &cur_aux(env)->loop_inline_state;
+ struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env);
+ struct bpf_reg_state *flags_reg = ®s[BPF_REG_4];
+
+ int flags_is_zero =
+ register_is_const(flags_reg) && flags_reg->var_off.value == 0;
+
+ if (state->initialized) {
+ state->flags_is_zero &= flags_is_zero;
+ state->callback_is_constant &= state->callback_subprogno == subprogno;
+ } else {
+ state->initialized = 1;
+ state->callback_is_constant = 1;
+ state->flags_is_zero = flags_is_zero;
+ state->callback_subprogno = subprogno;
+ }
+}
+
static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
int *insn_idx_p)
{
@@ -7255,6 +7322,7 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
err = check_bpf_snprintf_call(env, regs);
break;
case BPF_FUNC_loop:
+ update_loop_inline_state(env, meta.subprogno);
err = __check_func_call(env, insn, insn_idx_p, meta.subprogno,
set_loop_callback_state);
break;
@@ -7661,11 +7729,6 @@ static bool check_reg_sane_offset(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return true;
}
-static struct bpf_insn_aux_data *cur_aux(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
-{
- return &env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx];
-}
-
enum {
REASON_BOUNDS = -1,
REASON_TYPE = -2,
@@ -12920,6 +12983,22 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 of
return new_prog;
}
+static void adjust_loop_inline_subprogno(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ u32 first_removed,
+ u32 first_remaining)
+{
+ int delta = first_remaining - first_removed;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < env->prog->len; ++i) {
+ struct bpf_loop_inline_state *state =
+ &env->insn_aux_data[i].loop_inline_state;
+
+ if (state->initialized &&
+ state->callback_subprogno >= first_remaining)
+ state->callback_subprogno -= delta;
+ }
+}
+
static int adjust_subprog_starts_after_remove(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
u32 off, u32 cnt)
{
@@ -12963,6 +13042,8 @@ static int adjust_subprog_starts_after_remove(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
* in adjust_btf_func() - no need to adjust
*/
}
+
+ adjust_loop_inline_subprogno(env, i, j);
} else {
/* convert i from "first prog to remove" to "first to adjust" */
if (env->subprog_info[i].start == off)
@@ -13773,6 +13854,77 @@ static int fixup_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return 0;
}
+static struct bpf_prog *inline_bpf_loop(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int position, u32 *cnt)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux = &env->insn_aux_data[position];
+ int r6_offset = -env->prog->aux->stack_depth + 0 * BPF_REG_SIZE;
+ int r7_offset = -env->prog->aux->stack_depth + 1 * BPF_REG_SIZE;
+ int r8_offset = -env->prog->aux->stack_depth + 2 * BPF_REG_SIZE;
+ int reg_loop_max = BPF_REG_6;
+ int reg_loop_cnt = BPF_REG_7;
+ int reg_loop_ctx = BPF_REG_8;
+
+ struct bpf_prog *new_prog;
+ u32 callback_subprogno = aux->loop_inline_state.callback_subprogno;
+ u32 callback_start;
+ u32 call_insn_offset;
+ s32 callback_offset;
+
+ struct bpf_insn insn_buf[] = {
+ /* Return error and jump to the end of the patch if
+ * expected number of iterations is too big. This
+ * repeats the check done in bpf_loop helper function,
+ * be careful to modify this code in sync.
+ */
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_1, BPF_MAX_LOOPS, 2),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -E2BIG),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 16),
+ /* spill R6, R7, R8 to use these as loop vars */
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_6, r6_offset),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_7, r7_offset),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_8, r8_offset),
+ /* initialize loop vars */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(reg_loop_max, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(reg_loop_cnt, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(reg_loop_ctx, BPF_REG_3),
+ /* loop header,
+ * if reg_loop_cnt >= reg_loop_max skip the loop body
+ */
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, reg_loop_cnt, reg_loop_max, 5),
+ /* callback call,
+ * correct callback offset would be set after patching
+ */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, reg_loop_cnt),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, reg_loop_ctx),
+ BPF_CALL_REL(0),
+ /* increment loop counter */
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, reg_loop_cnt, 1),
+ /* jump to loop header if callback returned 0 */
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, -6),
+ /* return value of bpf_loop,
+ * set R0 to the number of iterations
+ */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, reg_loop_cnt),
+ /* restore original values of R6, R7, R8 */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_10, r6_offset),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_10, r7_offset),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_10, r8_offset),
+ };
+
+ *cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf);
+ new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, position, insn_buf, *cnt);
+ if (!new_prog)
+ return new_prog;
+
+ /* callback start is known only after patching */
+ callback_start = env->subprog_info[callback_subprogno].start;
+ call_insn_offset = position + 12;
+ callback_offset = callback_start - call_insn_offset - 1;
+ env->prog->insnsi[call_insn_offset].imm = callback_offset;
+
+ return new_prog;
+}
+
/* Do various post-verification rewrites in a single program pass.
* These rewrites simplify JIT and interpreter implementations.
*/
@@ -14258,6 +14410,18 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
continue;
}
+ if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_loop &&
+ fit_for_bpf_loop_inline(&env->insn_aux_data[i + delta])) {
+ new_prog = inline_bpf_loop(env, i + delta, &cnt);
+ if (!new_prog)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ delta += cnt - 1;
+ env->prog = prog = new_prog;
+ insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta;
+ continue;
+ }
+
patch_call_imm:
fn = env->ops->get_func_proto(insn->imm, env->prog);
/* all functions that have prototype and verifier allowed
@@ -15030,6 +15194,9 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
if (ret == 0)
ret = check_max_stack_depth(env);
+ if (ret == 0)
+ adjust_stack_depth_for_loop_inlining(env);
+
/* instruction rewrites happen after this point */
if (is_priv) {
if (ret == 0)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c
index 380d7a2072e3..9188acf42721 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c
@@ -120,6 +120,25 @@ static void check_nested_calls(struct bpf_loop *skel)
bpf_link__destroy(link);
}
+static void check_non_constant_callback(struct bpf_loop *skel)
+{
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+
+ link = bpf_program__attach(skel->progs.prog_non_constant_callback);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "link"))
+ return;
+
+ skel->bss->callback_selector = 0x0F;
+ usleep(1);
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->g_output, 0x0F, "g_output #1");
+
+ skel->bss->callback_selector = 0xF0;
+ usleep(1);
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->g_output, 0xF0, "g_output #2");
+
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+}
+
void test_bpf_loop(void)
{
struct bpf_loop *skel;
@@ -140,6 +159,8 @@ void test_bpf_loop(void)
check_invalid_flags(skel);
if (test__start_subtest("check_nested_calls"))
check_nested_calls(skel);
+ if (test__start_subtest("check_non_constant_callback"))
+ check_non_constant_callback(skel);
bpf_loop__destroy(skel);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop.c
index e08565282759..bc9e3ba583bc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ u32 nested_callback_nr_loops;
u32 stop_index = -1;
u32 nr_loops;
int pid;
+int callback_selector;
/* Making these global variables so that the userspace program
* can verify the output through the skeleton
@@ -111,3 +112,40 @@ int prog_nested_calls(void *ctx)
return 0;
}
+
+static int callback_set_f0(int i, void *ctx)
+{
+ g_output = 0xF0;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int callback_set_0f(int i, void *ctx)
+{
+ g_output = 0x0F;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * non-constant callback is a corner case for bpf_loop inline logic
+ */
+SEC("fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_nanosleep")
+int prog_non_constant_callback(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct callback_ctx data = {};
+
+ if (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32 != pid)
+ return 0;
+
+ int (*callback)(int i, void *ctx);
+
+ g_output = 0;
+
+ if (callback_selector == 0x0F)
+ callback = callback_set_0f;
+ else
+ callback = callback_set_f0;
+
+ bpf_loop(1, callback, NULL, 0);
+
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..6ce690b04b14
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
+#define BTF_TYPES \
+ .btf_strings = "\0int\0i\0ctx\0callback\0main\0", \
+ .btf_types = { \
+ /* 1: int */ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(1, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), \
+ /* 2: int* */ BTF_PTR_ENC(1), \
+ /* 3: void* */ BTF_PTR_ENC(0), \
+ /* 4: int __(void*) */ BTF_FUNC_PROTO_ENC(1, 1), \
+ BTF_FUNC_PROTO_ARG_ENC(7, 3), \
+ /* 5: int __(int, int*) */ BTF_FUNC_PROTO_ENC(1, 2), \
+ BTF_FUNC_PROTO_ARG_ENC(5, 1), \
+ BTF_FUNC_PROTO_ARG_ENC(7, 2), \
+ /* 6: main */ BTF_FUNC_ENC(20, 4), \
+ /* 7: callback */ BTF_FUNC_ENC(11, 5), \
+ BTF_END_RAW \
+ }
+
+#define MAIN_TYPE 6
+#define CALLBACK_TYPE 7
+
+/* can't use BPF_CALL_REL, jit_subprogs adjusts IMM & OFF
+ * fields for pseudo calls
+ */
+#define PSEUDO_CALL_INSN() \
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_CALL, \
+ INSN_OFF_MASK, INSN_IMM_MASK)
+
+/* can't use BPF_FUNC_loop constant,
+ * do_mix_fixups adjusts the IMM field
+ */
+#define HELPER_CALL_INSN() \
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, INSN_OFF_MASK, INSN_IMM_MASK)
+
+{
+ "inline simple bpf_loop call",
+ .insns = {
+ /* main */
+ /* force verifier state branching to verify logic on first and
+ * subsequent bpf_loop insn processing steps
+ */
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_jiffies64),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 777, 2),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_1, 2),
+
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC, 0, 6),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_3, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_4, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_loop),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* callback */
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .expected_insns = { PSEUDO_CALL_INSN() },
+ .unexpected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .runs = 0,
+ .func_info = { { 0, MAIN_TYPE }, { 12, CALLBACK_TYPE } },
+ .func_info_cnt = 2,
+ BTF_TYPES
+},
+{
+ "don't inline bpf_loop call, flags non-zero",
+ .insns = {
+ /* main */
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC, 0, 6),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_3, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_4, 1),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_loop),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* callback */
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .expected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() },
+ .unexpected_insns = { PSEUDO_CALL_INSN() },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .runs = 0,
+ .func_info = { { 0, MAIN_TYPE }, { 8, CALLBACK_TYPE } },
+ .func_info_cnt = 2,
+ BTF_TYPES
+},
+{
+ "don't inline bpf_loop call, callback non-constant",
+ .insns = {
+ /* main */
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_jiffies64),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 777, 4), /* pick a random callback */
+
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC, 0, 10),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 3),
+
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC, 0, 8),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
+
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_3, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_4, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_loop),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* callback */
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* callback #2 */
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .expected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() },
+ .unexpected_insns = { PSEUDO_CALL_INSN() },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .runs = 0,
+ .func_info = {
+ { 0, MAIN_TYPE },
+ { 14, CALLBACK_TYPE },
+ { 16, CALLBACK_TYPE }
+ },
+ .func_info_cnt = 3,
+ BTF_TYPES
+},
+{
+ "bpf_loop_inline over a dead func",
+ .insns = {
+ /* main */
+
+ /* A reference to callback #1 to make verifier count in as a func.
+ * This reference is overwritten below and callback #1 is dead.
+ */
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC, 0, 9),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC, 0, 8),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_3, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_4, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_loop),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* callback */
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* callback #2 */
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .expected_insns = { PSEUDO_CALL_INSN() },
+ .unexpected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .runs = 0,
+ .func_info = {
+ { 0, MAIN_TYPE },
+ { 10, CALLBACK_TYPE },
+ { 12, CALLBACK_TYPE }
+ },
+ .func_info_cnt = 3,
+ BTF_TYPES
+},
+{
+ "bpf_loop_inline stack locations for loop vars",
+ .insns = {
+ /* main */
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, 0x77),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC, 0, 6),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_3, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_4, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_loop),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* callback */
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .expected_insns = {
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_6, -40),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_7, -32),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_8, -24),
+ },
+ .unexpected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .func_info = {
+ { 0, MAIN_TYPE },
+ { 9, CALLBACK_TYPE },
+ },
+ .func_info_cnt = 2,
+ BTF_TYPES
+},
+#undef HELPER_CALL_INSN
+#undef PSEUDO_CALL_INSN
+#undef CALLBACK_TYPE
+#undef MAIN_TYPE
+#undef BTF_TYPES
--
2.25.1
