help to debug a kretprobe_dispatcher issue with 5.12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Masami,

In our production servers, with 5.12, we hit an oops like below:

Backtrace:
#0  kretprobe_dispatcher (kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:1744:2)
#1  __kretprobe_trampoline_handler (kernel/kprobes.c:1960:4)
#2  kretprobe_trampoline_handler (include/linux/kprobes.h:219:8)
#3  trampoline_handler (arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c:846:2)
#4  __kretprobe_trampoline+0x2a/0x4b
#5  0xffffffff810c91e0
Dmesg:
...
[1435716.133501] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000a0
[1435716.147783] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[1435716.158411] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[1435716.169039] PGD 6df216067 P4D 6df216067 PUD 6aad80067 PMD 0
[1435716.180714] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
[1435716.187343] CPU: 19 PID: 3139400 Comm: tupperware-agen Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S O K 5.12.0-0_fbk5_clang_4818_g9939bf8c1268 #1 [1435716.212570] Hardware name: Wiwynn Twin Lakes MP/Twin Lakes Passive MP, BIOS YMM16 05/24/2021
[1435716.229803] RIP: 0010:kretprobe_dispatcher+0x16/0x70
[1435716.240089] Code: b5 3d 00 48 8b 83 d8 00 00 00 8b 00 eb d8 31 c0 5b 41 5e c3 41 57 41 56 53 49 89 f6 48 89 fb 48 8b 47 18 48 8b 00 4c 8d 78 e8 <48> 8b 88 a0 00 00 00 65 48 ff 01 48 8b 80 c0 00 00 00 8b 00 a8 01
[1435716.278001] RSP: 0018:ffffc90001d77db8 EFLAGS: 00010286
[1435716.288797] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8884b586fa00 RCX: 0000000000000000 [1435716.303416] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffc90001d77e30 RDI: ffff8884b586fa00 [1435716.318037] RBP: ffff8884b586fa10 R08: 0000000000000078 R09: ffff888450a944b0 [1435716.332659] R10: 0000000000000013 R11: ffffffff82c56d38 R12: ffff888765e5ae00 [1435716.347278] R13: ffff8884b586fa10 R14: ffffc90001d77e30 R15: ffffffffffffffe8 [1435716.361896] FS: 00007f3897afd700(0000) GS:ffff88885fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[1435716.378427] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[1435716.390264] CR2: 00000000000000a0 CR3: 0000000674c5f003 CR4: 00000000007706e0 [1435716.404882] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [1435716.419502] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[1435716.434121] PKRU: 55555554
[1435716.439876] Call Trace:

Our 5.12 is not exactly the upstream stable 5.12, which contains some additional backport. But I checked kernel/trace, kernel/events and arch/x86 directory, we didn't add any major changes except some bpf
changes which I think should not trigger the above oops.

Further code analysis (through checking asm codes) find the issue
is below:

static nokprobe_inline struct kretprobe *get_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri)
{
        RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_any_held(),
"Kretprobe is accessed from instance under preemptive context");

        return READ_ONCE(ri->rph->rp);
}

static int
kretprobe_dispatcher(struct kretprobe_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
        struct kretprobe *rp = get_kretprobe(ri);
            <=== rp is a NULL pointer here
struct trace_kprobe *tk = container_of(rp, struct trace_kprobe, rp);

        raw_cpu_inc(*tk->nhit);
        ...
}

It looks like 'rp' is a NULL pointer at the time of failure. And the
only places I found 'rp' could be NULL is in unregister_kretprobes.

void unregister_kretprobes(struct kretprobe **rps, int num)
{
        int i;

        if (num <= 0)
                return;
        mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
        for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
                if (__unregister_kprobe_top(&rps[i]->kp) < 0)
                        rps[i]->kp.addr = NULL;
                rps[i]->rph->rp = NULL;
        }
        mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
        ...
}

So I suspect there is a race condition between kretprobe_dispatcher()
(or higher level kretprobe_trampoline_handler()) and unregister_kretprobes(). I looked at kernel/trace code and had not
found an obvious race yet. I will continue to check.
But at the same time, I would like to seek some expert advice to see
whether you are aware of any potential issues in 5.12 or not and where
are possible places I should focus on to add debug codes for experiments.

Thanks!

Yonghong



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux