Re: [linux-next:master] BUILD REGRESSION 8cb8311e95e3bb58bd84d6350365f14a718faa6d

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25 May 2022, at 22:50, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 26 May 2022 05:35:20 +0800 kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>> branch HEAD: 8cb8311e95e3bb58bd84d6350365f14a718faa6d  Add linux-next specific files for 20220525
>> 
>> Error/Warning reports:
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>> Unverified Error/Warning (likely false positive, please contact us if interested):
> 
> Could be so.
> 
>> mm/shmem.c:1948 shmem_getpage_gfp() warn: should '(((1) << 12) / 512) << folio_order(folio)' be a 64 bit type?
> 
> I've been seeing this one for a while.  And from this report I can't
> figure out what tool emitted it.  Clang?
> 
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>> |-- i386-randconfig-m021
>> |   `-- mm-shmem.c-shmem_getpage_gfp()-warn:should-((()-)-)-folio_order(folio)-be-a-bit-type
> 
> If you're going to use randconfig then shouldn't you make the config
> available?  Or maybe quote the KCONFIG_SEED - presumably there's a way
> for others to regenerate.
> 
> Anyway, the warning seems wrong to me.
> 
> 
> #define PAGE_SIZE               (_AC(1,UL) << PAGE_SHIFT)
> 
> #define BLOCKS_PER_PAGE  (PAGE_SIZE/512)
> 
> 	inode->i_blocks += BLOCKS_PER_PAGE << folio_order(folio);
> 
> so the RHS here should have unsigned long type.  Being able to generate
> the cpp output would be helpful.  That requires the .config.

This is i386, so an unsigned long is 32-bit, but i_blocks is a blkcnt_t
i.e. a u64, which makes the shift without a cast of the LHS fishy.

Jess





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux