Hi all,
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:29:05 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
>
> kernel/sysctl.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 2900005ea287 ("bpf: Move BPF sysctls from kernel/sysctl.c to BPF core")
>
> from the bpf-next, sysctl trees and commit:
>
> efaa0227f6c6 ("timers: Move timer sysctl into the timer code")
>
> from the tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc kernel/sysctl.c
> index 47139877f62d,5b7b1a82ae6a..000000000000
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@@ -2227,17 -2288,24 +2227,6 @@@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] =
> .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
> .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
> },
> - #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON)
> -#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> -- {
> - .procname = "timer_migration",
> - .data = &sysctl_timer_migration,
> - .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
> - .procname = "unprivileged_bpf_disabled",
> - .data = &sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled,
> - .maxlen = sizeof(sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled),
> -- .mode = 0644,
> - .proc_handler = timer_migration_handler,
> - .proc_handler = bpf_unpriv_handler,
> -- .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
> - .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
> - .extra2 = SYSCTL_TWO,
> - },
> - {
> - .procname = "bpf_stats_enabled",
> - .data = &bpf_stats_enabled_key.key,
> - .maxlen = sizeof(bpf_stats_enabled_key),
> - .mode = 0644,
> - .proc_handler = bpf_stats_handler,
> -- },
> --#endif
> #if defined(CONFIG_TREE_RCU)
> {
> .procname = "panic_on_rcu_stall",
This is now a conflict between the tip tree and the net-next and sysctl trees.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgp_MrUd67n91.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
