Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: add reason of rejection in ld_imm64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 5/20/22 4:37 AM, Shung-Hsi Yu wrote:
It may not be immediately clear why that ld_imm64 test cases are
rejected, especially for test1 and test2 where JMP to the 2nd
instruction of BPF_LD_IMM64 is performed.

Add brief explaination of why each test case in verifier/ld_imm64.c
should be rejected.

Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@xxxxxxxx>
---
  .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c | 20 ++++++++++---------
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c
index f9297900cea6..021312641aaf 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
+/* Note: BPF_LD_IMM64 is composed of two instructions of class BPF_LD */

[...]LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 0),
@@ -42,7 +43,7 @@
  	.result = REJECT,
  },
  {
-	"test4 ld_imm64",
+	"test4 ld_imm64: reject incomplete BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction",
  	.insns = {
  	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 0),
  	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
@@ -70,7 +71,7 @@
  	.retval = 1,
  },
  {
-	"test8 ld_imm64",
+	"test8 ld_imm64: reject 1st off!=0",

Let add some space like 'off != 0'. The same for
some of later test names.

  	.insns = {
  	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 1, 1),
  	BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 1),
@@ -80,7 +81,7 @@
  	.result = REJECT,
  },
  {
-	"test9 ld_imm64",
+	"test9 ld_imm64: reject 2nd off!=0",
  	.insns = {
  	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 1),
  	BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 1, 1),
@@ -90,7 +91,7 @@
  	.result = REJECT,
  },
  {
-	"test10 ld_imm64",
+	"test10 ld_imm64: reject 2nd dst_reg!=0",
  	.insns = {
  	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 1),
  	BPF_RAW_INSN(0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 0, 1),
@@ -100,7 +101,7 @@
  	.result = REJECT,
  },
  {
-	"test11 ld_imm64",
+	"test11 ld_imm64: reject 2nd src_reg!=0",
  	.insns = {
  	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 1),
  	BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
@@ -113,6 +114,7 @@
  	"test12 ld_imm64",
  	.insns = {
  	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	/* BPF_REG_1 is interpreted as BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD */
  	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
  	BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
  	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
@@ -121,7 +123,7 @@
  	.result = REJECT,
  },
  {
-	"test13 ld_imm64",
+	"test13 ld_imm64: 2nd src_reg!=0",
  	.insns = {
  	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
  	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux