Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/12] libbpf: Textual representation of enums

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 2:30 PM Daniel Müller <deso@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This patch set introduces the means for querying a textual representation of
> the following BPF related enum types:
> - enum bpf_map_type
> - enum bpf_prog_type
> - enum bpf_attach_type
> - enum bpf_link_type
>
> To make that possible, we introduce a new public function for each of the types:
> libbpf_bpf_<type>_type_str.
>
> Having a way to query a textual representation has been asked for in the past
> (by systemd, among others). Such representations can generally be useful in
> tracing and logging contexts, among others. At this point, at least one client,
> bpftool, maintains such a mapping manually, which is prone to get out of date as
> new enum variants are introduced. libbpf is arguably best situated to keep this
> list complete and up-to-date. This patch series adds BTF based tests to ensure
> that exhaustiveness is upheld moving forward.
>
> The libbpf provided textual representation can be inferred from the
> corresponding enum variant name by removing the prefix and lowercasing the
> remainder. E.g., BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER -> socket_filter. Unfortunately,
> bpftool does not use such a programmatic approach for some of the
> bpf_attach_type variants. We decided changing its behavior to work with libbpf
> representations. However, for user inputs, specifically, we do keep support for
> the traditionally used names around (please see patch "bpftool: Use
> libbpf_bpf_attach_type_str").
>
> The patch series is structured as follows:
> - for each enumeration type in {bpf_prog_type, bpf_map_type, bpf_attach_type,
>   bpf_link_type}:
>   - we first introduce the corresponding public libbpf API function
>   - we then add BTF based self-tests
>   - we lastly adjust bpftool to use the libbpf provided functionality
>
> Changelog:
> v2 -> v3:
> - use LIBBPF_1.0.0 section in libbpf.map for newly added exports
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - adjusted bpftool to work with algorithmically determined attach types as
>   libbpf now uses (just removed prefix from enum name and lowercased the rest)
>   - adjusted tests, man page, and completion script to work with the new names
>   - renamed bpf_attach_type_str -> bpf_attach_type_input_str
>   - for input: added special cases that accept the traditionally used strings as
>     well
> - changed 'char const *' -> 'const char *'
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>

So this looks good to me for libbpf and selftests/bpf changes. I'll
wait for Quentin to give his acks at least for bpftool changes.
Quention, please take a look when you get a chance.

Few small nits, please accommodate them in next version, if you happen
to send another one. If not, I'll try to remember to fix it up when
applying.

1. Received Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags should be added to each
individual patch, not cover letter.

2. You are using /** ... */ comments, which are considered to be kdoc
comments and they have some additional formatting, which some of the
tooling run on patches in Patchworks complains about [0]. Please use
just /* ... */ style everywhere where it's not actual kdoc (or libbpf
API documentation).

  [0] https://patchwork.hopto.org/static/nipa/643335/12856068/kdoc/summary

> Daniel Müller (12):
>   libbpf: Introduce libbpf_bpf_prog_type_str
>   selftests/bpf: Add test for libbpf_bpf_prog_type_str
>   bpftool: Use libbpf_bpf_prog_type_str
>   libbpf: Introduce libbpf_bpf_map_type_str
>   selftests/bpf: Add test for libbpf_bpf_map_type_str
>   bpftool: Use libbpf_bpf_map_type_str
>   libbpf: Introduce libbpf_bpf_attach_type_str
>   selftests/bpf: Add test for libbpf_bpf_attach_type_str
>   bpftool: Use libbpf_bpf_attach_type_str
>   libbpf: Introduce libbpf_bpf_link_type_str
>   selftests/bpf: Add test for libbpf_bpf_link_type_str
>   bpftool: Use libbpf_bpf_link_type_str
>
>  .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-cgroup.rst  |  16 +-
>  .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst    |   5 +-
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool     |  18 +-
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/cgroup.c                    |  49 +++--
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c                    |  82 +++----
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c                   |  87 +++++---
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c                      |  61 +++---
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h                      |  23 +-
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c                       |  82 +++----
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c                      |  77 +++----
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        | 160 ++++++++++++++
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h                        |  36 +++
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map                      |   6 +
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/libbpf_str.c     | 207 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py   | 163 ++++++--------
>  15 files changed, 738 insertions(+), 334 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/libbpf_str.c
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux