Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Fix determine_ptr_size() guessing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 5/20/22 8:38 AM, Douglas RAILLARD wrote:
From: Douglas Raillard <douglas.raillard@xxxxxxx>

One strategy employed by libbpf to guess the pointer size is by finding
the size of "unsigned long" type. This is achieved by looking for a type
of with the expected name and checking its size.

Unfortunately, the C syntax is friendlier to humans than to computers
as there is some variety in how such a type can be named. Specifically,
gcc and clang do not use the same name in debug info.

Yes, this is indeed the case.


Lookup all the names for such a type so that libbpf can hope to find the
information it wants.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Raillard <douglas.raillard@xxxxxxx>

LGTM with some comments and needed change below.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>

---
  tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
index 1383e26c5d1f..ce05e4b1febd 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
@@ -489,8 +489,18 @@ static int determine_ptr_size(const struct btf *btf)
  		if (!name)
  			continue;
- if (strcmp(name, "long int") == 0 ||
-		    strcmp(name, "long unsigned int") == 0) {
+		if (
+			strcmp(name, "long int") == 0 ||
+			strcmp(name, "int long") == 0 ||
+			strcmp(name, "unsigned long") == 0 ||
+			strcmp(name, "long unsigned") == 0 ||
+			strcmp(name, "unsigned long int") == 0 ||
+			strcmp(name, "unsigned int long") == 0 ||
+			strcmp(name, "long unsigned int") == 0 ||
+			strcmp(name, "long int unsigned") == 0 ||
+			strcmp(name, "int unsigned long") == 0 ||
+			strcmp(name, "int long unsigned") == 0

Please add "long" as well. For "long t" declaration, clang generates
the following dwarf:

0x00000029:   DW_TAG_base_type
                DW_AT_name      ("long")
                DW_AT_encoding  (DW_ATE_signed)
                DW_AT_byte_size (0x08)

If the type name can be sorted with words, we only need
to compare the following 4 instead of 11
  "long"
  "int long"
  "long unsigned"
  "int long unsigned"

But I don't know whether we have an existing function
to do word sorting or not.


+		) {
  			if (t->size != 4 && t->size != 8)
  				continue;
  			return t->size;



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux