在 2022/5/17 上午11:09, Yonghong Song 写道:
On 5/15/22 7:24 PM, Feng zhou wrote:
From: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
comments from Andrii Nakryiko, details in here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220511093854.411-1-zhoufeng.zf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/
use /* */ instead of //
use libbpf_num_possible_cpus() instead of sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
use 8 bytes for value size
fix memory leak
use ASSERT_EQ instead of ASSERT_OK
add bpf_loop to fetch values on each possible CPU
Fixes: ed7c13776e20c74486b0939a3c1de984c5efb6aa ("selftests/bpf: add
test case for bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem")
Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
LGTM with a few nits below.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>
Ok, will do. Thanks.
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 49 +++++++++------
.../bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 61 ++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git
a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
index 58b24c2112b0..89ca170f1c25 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
@@ -1,30 +1,39 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-// Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */
#include <test_progs.h>
The above empty line is unnecessary.
#include "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.skel.h"
-#define TEST_VALUE 1
-
void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
{
struct test_map_lookup_percpu_elem *skel;
- int key = 0, ret;
- int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
- int *buf;
+ __u64 key = 0, sum;
+ int ret, i;
+ int nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
+ __u64 *buf;
- buf = (int *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
+ buf = (__u64 *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(__u64));
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))
return;
- memset(buf, 0, nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
- buf[0] = TEST_VALUE;
- skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load();
- if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel,
"test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load"))
- return;
+ for (i=0; i<nr_cpus; i++)
+ buf[i] = i;
+ sum = (nr_cpus-1)*nr_cpus/2;
+
+ skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open"))
+ goto exit;
+
+ skel->rodata->nr_cpus = nr_cpus;
+
+ ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach(skel);
- ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach");
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
ret =
bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.percpu_array_map), &key,
buf, 0);
ASSERT_OK(ret, "percpu_array_map update");
@@ -37,10 +46,14 @@ void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
syscall(__NR_getuid);
- ret = skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
- skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
- skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE;
- ASSERT_OK(!ret, "bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem success");
+ test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__detach(skel);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_array
lookup percpu elem");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_hash
lookup percpu elem");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_sum, sum,
"percpu_lru_hash lookup percpu elem");
+cleanup:
test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__destroy(skel);
+exit:
+ free(buf);
}
[...]
+struct read_percpu_elem_ctx {
+ void *map;
+ __u64 sum;
+};
+
+static int read_percpu_elem_callback(__u32 index, struct
read_percpu_elem_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ __u64 key = 0;
+ __u64 *value;
Please add an empty line here.
+ value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(ctx->map, &key, index);
+ if (value)
+ ctx->sum += *value;
+ return 0;
+}
+
[...]
