On 5/15/22 1:36 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
Making arch_cpu_idle and rcu_idle_exit noinstr. Both functions run
in rcu 'not watching' context and if there's tracer attached to
them, which uses rcu (e.g. kprobe multi interface) it will hit RCU
warning like:
[ 3.017540] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
...
[ 3.018363] kprobe_multi_link_handler+0x68/0x1c0
[ 3.018364] ? kprobe_multi_link_handler+0x3e/0x1c0
[ 3.018366] ? arch_cpu_idle_dead+0x10/0x10
[ 3.018367] ? arch_cpu_idle_dead+0x10/0x10
[ 3.018371] fprobe_handler.part.0+0xab/0x150
[ 3.018374] 0xffffffffa00080c8
[ 3.018393] ? arch_cpu_idle+0x5/0x10
[ 3.018398] arch_cpu_idle+0x5/0x10
[ 3.018399] default_idle_call+0x59/0x90
[ 3.018401] do_idle+0x1c3/0x1d0
The call path is following:
default_idle_call
rcu_idle_enter
arch_cpu_idle
rcu_idle_exit
The arch_cpu_idle and rcu_idle_exit are the only ones from above
path that are traceble and cause this problem on my setup.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 2 +-
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
index b370767f5b19..1345cb0124a6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ void arch_cpu_idle_dead(void)
/*
* Called from the generic idle code.
*/
-void arch_cpu_idle(void)
+void noinstr arch_cpu_idle(void)
noinstr includes a lot of attributes:
#define noinstr \
noinline notrace __attribute((__section__(".noinstr.text"))) \
__no_kcsan __no_sanitize_address __no_profile
__no_sanitize_coverage
should we use notrace here?
{
x86_idle();
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index a4b8189455d5..20d529722f51 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ static void noinstr rcu_eqs_exit(bool user)
* If you add or remove a call to rcu_idle_exit(), be sure to test with
* CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y.
*/
-void rcu_idle_exit(void)
+void noinstr rcu_idle_exit(void)
{
unsigned long flags;
