Re: [PATCH bpf-next 05/12] bpftool: Add btf enum64 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 5/9/22 4:31 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 12:00 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> wrote:

Add BTF_KIND_ENUM64 support.
For example, the following enum is defined in uapi bpf.h.
   $ cat core.c
   enum A {
         BPF_F_INDEX_MASK                = 0xffffffffULL,
         BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU               = BPF_F_INDEX_MASK,
         BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK               = (0xfffffULL << 32),
   } g;
Compiled with
   clang -target bpf -O2 -g -c core.c
Using bpftool to dump types and generate format C file:
   $ bpftool btf dump file core.o
   ...
   [1] ENUM64 'A' size=8 vlen=3
         'BPF_F_INDEX_MASK' val=4294967295ULL
         'BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU' val=4294967295ULL
         'BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK' val=4503595332403200ULL
   $ bpftool btf dump file core.o format c
   ...
   enum A {
         BPF_F_INDEX_MASK = 4294967295ULL,
         BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU = 4294967295ULL,
         BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK = 4503595332403200ULL,

maybe we should have some heuristic that if the value is "big enough"
(e.g., larger than 1-128 millions) and is unsigned we should emit it
as hex?

I thought about this. But since you are also suggesting this, I will
do this (greater than 1 million).


   };
   ...

The 64bit value is represented properly in BTF and C dump.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>
---

just minor nits, LGTM

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>

  tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c        | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++
  tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c        |  1 +
  3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


[...]
+       case BTF_KIND_ENUM64: {
+               const struct btf_enum64 *v = (const void *)(t + 1);

can use btf_enum64() helper from libbpf?

+               __u16 vlen = BTF_INFO_VLEN(t->info);

btf_vlen(t)

I copied the code from above BTF_KIND_ENUM. But I certainly can do this.


+               int i;
+
+               if (json_output) {
+                       jsonw_uint_field(w, "size", t->size);
+                       jsonw_uint_field(w, "vlen", vlen);
+                       jsonw_name(w, "values");
+                       jsonw_start_array(w);
+               } else {
+                       printf(" size=%u vlen=%u", t->size, vlen);
+               }
+               for (i = 0; i < vlen; i++, v++) {
+                       const char *name = btf_str(btf, v->name_off);
+                       __u64 val = (__u64)v->hi32 << 32 | v->lo32;

() ?

okay.


+
+                       if (json_output) {
+                               jsonw_start_object(w);
+                               jsonw_string_field(w, "name", name);
+                               if (btf_kflag(t))
+                                       jsonw_uint_field(w, "val", val);
+                               else
+                                       jsonw_int_field(w, "val", val);
+                               jsonw_end_object(w);
+                       } else {
+                               if (btf_kflag(t))
+                                       printf("\n\t'%s' val=%lluULL", name, val);
+                               else
+                                       printf("\n\t'%s' val=%lldLL", name, val);
                         }
                 }
                 if (json_output)
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c
index f5dddf8ef404..f9f38384b9a6 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c
@@ -182,6 +182,35 @@ static int btf_dumper_enum(const struct btf_dumper *d,
         return 0;
  }

+static int btf_dumper_enum64(const struct btf_dumper *d,
+                            const struct btf_type *t,
+                            const void *data)
+{
+       const struct btf_enum64 *enums = btf_enum64(t);
+       __u32 hi32, lo32;
+       __u64 value;
+       __u16 i;
+
+       if (t->size != 8)
+               return -EINVAL;

no need

sure.


+
+       value = *(__u64 *)data;
+       hi32 = value >> 32;
+       lo32 = (__u32)value;
+

[...]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux