Kernel Test Robot complained about missing static storage class annotation for bpf_kptr_xchg_proto variable. sparse: symbol 'bpf_kptr_xchg_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? This caused by missing extern definition in the header. Add it to suppress the sparse warning. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx> --- include/linux/bpf.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 551b7198ae8a..d1871eacf728 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -2224,6 +2224,7 @@ extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_find_vma_proto; extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_loop_proto; extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_strncmp_proto; extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_copy_from_user_task_proto; +extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_kptr_xchg_proto; const struct bpf_func_proto *tracing_prog_func_proto( enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog); -- 2.35.1
