On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 02:15:34PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Previous patch adds 1:1 mapping between all 211 LSM hooks
> and bpf_cgroup program array. Instead of reserving a slot per
> possible hook, reserve 10 slots per cgroup for lsm programs.
> Those slots are dynamically allocated on demand and reclaimed.
>
> It should be possible to eventually extend this idea to all hooks if
> the memory consumption is unacceptable and shrink overall effective
> programs array.
>
> struct cgroup_bpf {
> struct bpf_prog_array * effective[33]; /* 0 264 */
> /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 8 bytes ago --- */
> struct hlist_head progs[33]; /* 264 264 */
> /* --- cacheline 8 boundary (512 bytes) was 16 bytes ago --- */
> u8 flags[33]; /* 528 33 */
>
> /* XXX 7 bytes hole, try to pack */
>
> struct list_head storages; /* 568 16 */
> /* --- cacheline 9 boundary (576 bytes) was 8 bytes ago --- */
> struct bpf_prog_array * inactive; /* 584 8 */
> struct percpu_ref refcnt; /* 592 16 */
> struct work_struct release_work; /* 608 72 */
>
> /* size: 680, cachelines: 11, members: 7 */
> /* sum members: 673, holes: 1, sum holes: 7 */
> /* last cacheline: 40 bytes */
> };
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h | 3 +-
> include/linux/bpf_lsm.h | 6 --
> kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 5 --
> kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 4 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h
> index d5a70a35dace..359d3f16abea 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h
> @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@
>
> struct bpf_prog_array;
>
> -#define CGROUP_LSM_NUM 211 /* will be addressed in the next patch */
> +/* Maximum number of concurrently attachable per-cgroup LSM hooks. */
> +#define CGROUP_LSM_NUM 10
>
> enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type {
> CGROUP_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE_INVALID = -1,
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h b/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
> index 7f0e59f5f9be..613de44aa429 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
> @@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_inode_storage_delete_proto;
> void bpf_inode_storage_free(struct inode *inode);
>
> int bpf_lsm_find_cgroup_shim(const struct bpf_prog *prog, bpf_func_t *bpf_func);
> -int bpf_lsm_hook_idx(u32 btf_id);
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_BPF_LSM */
>
> @@ -74,11 +73,6 @@ static inline int bpf_lsm_find_cgroup_shim(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> -static inline int bpf_lsm_hook_idx(u32 btf_id)
> -{
> - return -EINVAL;
> -}
> -
> #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_LSM */
>
> #endif /* _LINUX_BPF_LSM_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
> index a0e68ef5dfb1..1079c747e061 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
> @@ -91,11 +91,6 @@ int bpf_lsm_find_cgroup_shim(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int bpf_lsm_hook_idx(u32 btf_id)
> -{
> - return btf_id_set_index(&bpf_lsm_hooks, btf_id);
> -}
> -
> int bpf_lsm_verify_prog(struct bpf_verifier_log *vlog,
> const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> {
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> index 9cc38454e402..787ff6cf8d42 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> @@ -79,10 +79,13 @@ unsigned int __cgroup_bpf_run_lsm_sock(const void *ctx,
> shim_prog = (const struct bpf_prog *)((void *)insn - offsetof(struct bpf_prog, insnsi));
>
> cgrp = sock_cgroup_ptr(&sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> - if (likely(cgrp))
> + if (likely(cgrp)) {
> + rcu_read_lock(); /* See bpf_lsm_attach_type_get(). */
I've looked at bpf_lsm_attach_type_get/put, but still don't get it :)
shim_prog->aux->cgroup_atype stays the same for the life of shim_prog.
atype_usecnt will go up and down, but atype_usecnt == 0 is the only
interesting one from the pov of selecting atype in _get().
And there shim_prog will be detached and trampoline destroyed.
The shim_prog->aux->cgroup_atype deref below cannot be happening on
freed shim_prog.
So what is the point of this critical section and sync_rcu() ?
It seems none of it is necessary.
> It should be possible to eventually extend this idea to all hooks if
> the memory consumption is unacceptable and shrink overall effective
> programs array.
if BPF_LSM_CGROUP do atype differently looks too special.
Why not to do this generalization right now?
Do atype_get for all cgroup hooks and get rid of to_cgroup_bpf_attach_type ?
Combine ranges of attach_btf_id for lsm_cgroup and enum bpf_attach_type
for traditional cgroup hooks into single _get() method that returns a slot
in effective[] array ?
attach/detach/query apis won't notice this internal implementation detail.
