On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 8:55 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 4/20/22 10:18 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 3:46 PM Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@xxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On 32 bit systems, shifting an unsigned long by 32 positions > >> yields the following warning: > >> > >> samples/bpf/tracex2_kern.c:60:23: warning: shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow] > >> unsigned int hi = v >> 32; > >> ^ ~~ > >> > > > > long is always 64-bit in BPF, but I suspect this is due to > > samples/bpf/Makefile still using this clang + llc combo, where clang > > is called with native target and llc for -target bpf. Not sure if we > > are ready to ditch that complicated combination. Yonghong, do we still > > need that or can we just use -target bpf in samples/bpf? > > Current most bpf programs in samples/bpf do not use vmlinux.h and CO-RE. > They direct use kernel header files. That is why clang C -> IR > compilation still needs to be native. > > We could just use -target bpf for the whole compilation but that needs > to change the code to use vmlinux.h and CO-RE. There are already a > couple of sample bpf programs did this. Right, I guess I'm proposing to switch samples/bpf to vmlinux.h. Only purely networking BPF apps can get away with not using vmlinux.h because they might avoid dependency on kernel types. But even then a lot of modern networking apps seem to be gaining elements of more generic tracing and would rely on CO-RE for staying "portable" between kernels. So it might be totally fine to just use CO-RE universally in samples/bpf? > > > > > > >> The usual way to avoid this is to shift by 16 two times (see > >> upper_32_bits() macro in the kernel). Use it across the BPF sample > >> code as well. > >> > >> Fixes: d822a1926849 ("samples/bpf: Add counting example for kfree_skb() function calls and the write() syscall") > >> Fixes: 0fb1170ee68a ("bpf: BPF based latency tracing") > >> Fixes: f74599f7c530 ("bpf: Add tests and samples for LWT-BPF") > >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@xxxxx> > >> --- > >> samples/bpf/lathist_kern.c | 2 +- > >> samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_kern.c | 2 +- > >> samples/bpf/tracex2_kern.c | 2 +- > >> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > > > > [...]