Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for kptr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 03:19:00AM +0530, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> Reuse bpf_prog_test functions to test the support for PTR_TO_BTF_ID in
> BPF map case, including some tests that verify implementation sanity and
> corner cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/bpf/test_run.c                            |  45 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c   |  55 +-
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c | 469 ++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c
> 
> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> index e7b9c2636d10..29fe32821e7e 100644
> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> @@ -584,6 +584,12 @@ noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release(struct prog_test_member *p)
>  {
>  }
>  
> +noinline struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *
> +bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc **p, int a, int b)
> +{
> +	return &prog_test_struct;
> +}
> +
>  struct prog_test_pass1 {
>  	int x0;
>  	struct {
> @@ -669,6 +675,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test3)
>  BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire)
>  BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_release)
>  BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release)
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get)
>  BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass_ctx)
>  BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass1)
>  BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass2)
> @@ -682,6 +689,7 @@ BTF_SET_END(test_sk_check_kfunc_ids)
>  
>  BTF_SET_START(test_sk_acquire_kfunc_ids)
>  BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire)
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get)
>  BTF_SET_END(test_sk_acquire_kfunc_ids)
>  
>  BTF_SET_START(test_sk_release_kfunc_ids)
> @@ -691,8 +699,13 @@ BTF_SET_END(test_sk_release_kfunc_ids)
>  
>  BTF_SET_START(test_sk_ret_null_kfunc_ids)
>  BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire)
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get)
>  BTF_SET_END(test_sk_ret_null_kfunc_ids)
>  
> +BTF_SET_START(test_sk_kptr_acquire_kfunc_ids)
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get)
> +BTF_SET_END(test_sk_kptr_acquire_kfunc_ids)
> +
>  static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 user_size,
>  			   u32 size, u32 headroom, u32 tailroom)
>  {
> @@ -1579,14 +1592,36 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_syscall(struct bpf_prog *prog,
>  
>  static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_prog_test_kfunc_set = {
>  	.owner        = THIS_MODULE,
> -	.check_set    = &test_sk_check_kfunc_ids,
> -	.acquire_set  = &test_sk_acquire_kfunc_ids,
> -	.release_set  = &test_sk_release_kfunc_ids,
> -	.ret_null_set = &test_sk_ret_null_kfunc_ids,
> +	.check_set        = &test_sk_check_kfunc_ids,
> +	.acquire_set      = &test_sk_acquire_kfunc_ids,
> +	.release_set      = &test_sk_release_kfunc_ids,
> +	.ret_null_set     = &test_sk_ret_null_kfunc_ids,
> +	.kptr_acquire_set = &test_sk_kptr_acquire_kfunc_ids
>  };

This hunk probably should have been in the previous patch,
but since it's not affecting bisect I left it as-is.

> +BTF_ID_LIST(bpf_prog_test_dtor_kfunc_ids)
> +BTF_ID(struct, prog_test_ref_kfunc)
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_release)
> +BTF_ID(struct, prog_test_member)
> +BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release)

dtor of prog_test_member doesn't seem to be used ?

Please improve dtor and kptr_get test methods for
struct prog_test_ref_kfunc and prog_test_member to do the real refcnting.
Empty methods are not testing things fully.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux