Re: [External] [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/3] selftests/bpf: Move vxlan tunnel testcases to test_progs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> 于2022年4月23日周六 08:37写道:
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 5:04 AM <fankaixi.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +#define VXLAN_TUNL_DEV0 "vxlan00"
> > +#define VXLAN_TUNL_DEV1 "vxlan11"
> > +#define IP6VXLAN_TUNL_DEV0 "ip6vxlan00"
> > +#define IP6VXLAN_TUNL_DEV1 "ip6vxlan11"
> > +
> > +#define SRC_INGRESS_PROG_PIN_FILE "/sys/fs/bpf/tc/test_tunnel_ingress_src"
> > +#define SRC_EGRESS_PROG_PIN_FILE "/sys/fs/bpf/tc/test_tunnel_egress_src"
> > +#define DST_EGRESS_PROG_PIN_FILE "/sys/fs/bpf/tc/test_tunnel_egress_dst"
> > +
> > +#define PING_ARGS "-c 3 -w 10 -q"

Thanks for the suggestion.

>
> Thanks for moving the test to test_progs,
> but its runtime is excessive.
>
> time ./test_progs -t tunnel
> #195 tunnel:OK
> Summary: 1/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>
> real    0m26.530s
> user    0m0.075s
> sys    0m1.317s
>
> Please find a way to test the functionality in a second or so.

Hi Alexei,
Do you mean the sys time should be in a second ?
Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux