On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 12:05:42PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > Looks good except for that I think this should just wait for v5.19. The > fixes are so large I can't see why this needs to be rushed in other than > the first assumptions of the optimizations had some flaws addressed here. Patches 1 and 2 are bug fixes for regressions caused by using huge page backed vmalloc by default. So I think we do need it for 5.18. The other two do look like candidates for 5.19, though.
