On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:58:17PM +0200, Jakob Koschel wrote: > We know that "dev > dst->last_switch" in the "else" block. > In other words, that "dev - dst->last_switch" is > 0. > > dsa_port_bridge_num_get(dp) can be 0, but the check > "if (bridge_num + dst->last_switch != dev) continue", rewritten as > "if (bridge_num != dev - dst->last_switch) continue", aka > "if (bridge_num != something which cannot be 0) continue", > makes it redundant to have the extra "if (!bridge_num) continue" logic, > since a bridge_num of zero would have been skipped anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx> Isn't this Vladimir's patch? If so, it should be commited as Vladimir as the author, and Vladimir's sign-off should appear before yours. When sending out such patches, there should be a From: line for Vladimir as the first line in the body of the patch email. The same goes for the next mv88e6xxx patch in this series - I think both of these are the patches Vladimir sent in his email: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220408123101.p33jpynhqo67hebe@skbuf Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
