On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 5:52 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Adding kallsyms_lookup_names function that resolves array of symbols > with single pass over kallsyms. > > The user provides array of string pointers with count and pointer to > allocated array for resolved values. > > int kallsyms_lookup_names(const char **syms, u32 cnt, > unsigned long *addrs) > > Before we iterate kallsyms we sort user provided symbols by name and > then use that in kalsyms iteration to find each kallsyms symbol in > user provided symbols. > > We also check each symbol to pass ftrace_location, because this API > will be used for fprobe symbols resolving. This can be optional in > future if there's a need. > > Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/kallsyms.h | 6 +++++ > kernel/kallsyms.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/kallsyms.h b/include/linux/kallsyms.h > index ce1bd2fbf23e..5320a5e77f61 100644 > --- a/include/linux/kallsyms.h > +++ b/include/linux/kallsyms.h > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ int kallsyms_on_each_symbol(int (*fn)(void *, const char *, struct module *, > #ifdef CONFIG_KALLSYMS > /* Lookup the address for a symbol. Returns 0 if not found. */ > unsigned long kallsyms_lookup_name(const char *name); > +int kallsyms_lookup_names(const char **syms, u32 cnt, unsigned long *addrs); > > extern int kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(unsigned long addr, > unsigned long *symbolsize, > @@ -103,6 +104,11 @@ static inline unsigned long kallsyms_lookup_name(const char *name) > return 0; > } > > +int kallsyms_lookup_names(const char **syms, u32 cnt, unsigned long *addrs) > +{ > + return -ERANGE; > +} > + > static inline int kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(unsigned long addr, > unsigned long *symbolsize, > unsigned long *offset) > diff --git a/kernel/kallsyms.c b/kernel/kallsyms.c > index 79f2eb617a62..a3738ddf9e87 100644 > --- a/kernel/kallsyms.c > +++ b/kernel/kallsyms.c > @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ > #include <linux/compiler.h> > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/bsearch.h> > +#include <linux/sort.h> > > /* > * These will be re-linked against their real values > @@ -572,6 +574,52 @@ int sprint_backtrace_build_id(char *buffer, unsigned long address) > return __sprint_symbol(buffer, address, -1, 1, 1); > } > > +static int symbols_cmp(const void *a, const void *b) isn't this literally strcmp? Or compiler will actually complain about const void * vs const char *? > +{ > + const char **str_a = (const char **) a; > + const char **str_b = (const char **) b; > + > + return strcmp(*str_a, *str_b); > +} > + > +struct kallsyms_data { > + unsigned long *addrs; > + const char **syms; > + u32 cnt; > + u32 found; > +}; > + > +static int kallsyms_callback(void *data, const char *name, > + struct module *mod, unsigned long addr) > +{ > + struct kallsyms_data *args = data; > + > + if (!bsearch(&name, args->syms, args->cnt, sizeof(*args->syms), symbols_cmp)) > + return 0; > + > + addr = ftrace_location(addr); > + if (!addr) > + return 0; > + > + args->addrs[args->found++] = addr; > + return args->found == args->cnt ? 1 : 0; > +} > + > +int kallsyms_lookup_names(const char **syms, u32 cnt, unsigned long *addrs) > +{ > + struct kallsyms_data args; > + > + sort(syms, cnt, sizeof(*syms), symbols_cmp, NULL); > + > + args.addrs = addrs; > + args.syms = syms; > + args.cnt = cnt; > + args.found = 0; > + kallsyms_on_each_symbol(kallsyms_callback, &args); > + > + return args.found == args.cnt ? 0 : -EINVAL; ESRCH or ENOENT makes a bit more sense as an error? > +} > + > /* To avoid using get_symbol_offset for every symbol, we carry prefix along. */ > struct kallsym_iter { > loff_t pos; > -- > 2.35.1 >