在 4/8/22 3:04 AM, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 7:38 PM Haowen Bai <baihaowen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> link could be null but still dereference bpf_link__destroy(&link->link)
>> and it will lead to a null pointer access.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c b/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
>> index 1bce2eab5e89..b02ebc4ba57c 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
>> @@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ struct bpf_link *usdt_manager_attach_usdt(struct usdt_manager *man, const struct
>> link = calloc(1, sizeof(*link));
>> if (!link) {
>> err = -ENOMEM;
>> - goto err_out;
>> + goto link_err;
> this is not a complete fix because there are two more similar goto
> err_out; above which you didn't fix. I think better fix is to just add
> if (link) check before bpf_link__destroy(), which is what I did
> locally when applying.
>
>
>> }
>>
>> link->usdt_man = man;
>> @@ -1072,7 +1072,7 @@ struct bpf_link *usdt_manager_attach_usdt(struct usdt_manager *man, const struct
>>
>> err_out:
>> bpf_link__destroy(&link->link);
>> -
>> +link_err:
>> free(targets);
>> hashmap__free(specs_hash);
>> if (elf)
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
Thank you for your kindness help. :)
--
Haowen Bai
