Explicitly set libbpf 1.0 API mode, then we can avoid using the deprecated RLIMIT_MEMLOCK. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx> --- tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c | 18 ++---------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c b/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c index d78f4148597f..83c5993a139a 100644 --- a/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c +++ b/tools/bpf/runqslower/runqslower.c @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> -#include <sys/resource.h> #include <time.h> #include <bpf/libbpf.h> #include <bpf/bpf.h> @@ -88,16 +87,6 @@ int libbpf_print_fn(enum libbpf_print_level level, return vfprintf(stderr, format, args); } -static int bump_memlock_rlimit(void) -{ - struct rlimit rlim_new = { - .rlim_cur = RLIM_INFINITY, - .rlim_max = RLIM_INFINITY, - }; - - return setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_new); -} - void handle_event(void *ctx, int cpu, void *data, __u32 data_sz) { const struct runq_event *e = data; @@ -133,11 +122,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_fn); - err = bump_memlock_rlimit(); - if (err) { - fprintf(stderr, "failed to increase rlimit: %d", err); - return 1; - } + /* Use libbpf 1.0 API mode */ + libbpf_set_strict_mode(LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL); obj = runqslower_bpf__open(); if (!obj) { -- 2.17.1