On Mon, 4 Apr 2022, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > attach_probe selftest fails on aarch64 with `failed to create kprobe > 'sys_nanosleep+0x0' perf event: No such file or directory`. This is > because, like on several other architectures, nanosleep has a prefix. > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for adding this! I'm seeing a clean test pass on aarch64 now: Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h > index 93c1ff705533..eec4c7385b14 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h > @@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ int trigger_module_test_write(int write_sz); > #define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__x64_sys_nanosleep" > #elif defined(__s390x__) > #define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__s390x_sys_nanosleep" > +#elif defined(__aarch64__) > +#define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__arm64_sys_nanosleep" > #else > #define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "sys_nanosleep" > #endif > -- > 2.35.1 > >
