> -----Original Message----- > From: Lobakin, Alexandr <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2022 10:01 AM > To: Michael, Alice <alice.michael@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Lobakin, Alexandr <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>; ivecera > <ivecera@xxxxxxxxxx>; Fijalkowski, Maciej <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx>; > netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; poros <poros@xxxxxxxxxx>; mschmidt > <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Brandeburg, Jesse > <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>; Nguyen, Anthony L > <anthony.l.nguyen@xxxxxxxxx>; David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>; > Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>; Daniel Borkmann > <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@xxxxxxxxxx>; John > Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>; Andrii Nakryiko > <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>; Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>; Song Liu > <songliubraving@xxxxxx>; Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>; KP Singh > <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>; moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS <intel- > wired-lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; open list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; open > list:XDP (eXpress Data Path) <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ice: Fix logic of getting XSK pool associated with Tx > queue > > From: Alice Michael <alice.michael@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:47:18 +0000 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 10:55 AM > > > To: Fijalkowski, Maciej <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; poros <poros@xxxxxxxxxx>; mschmidt > > > <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Brandeburg, Jesse > > > <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>; Nguyen, Anthony L > > > <anthony.l.nguyen@xxxxxxxxx>; David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > > > Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>; > > > Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>; Daniel Borkmann > > > <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@xxxxxxxxxx>; > > > John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>; Andrii Nakryiko > > > <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>; Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>; Song Liu > > > <songliubraving@xxxxxx>; Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>; KP Singh > > > <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>; > > > Krzysztof Kazimierczak <krzysztof.kazimierczak@xxxxxxxxx>; Lobakin, > > > Alexandr <alexandr.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>; moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET > > > DRIVERS <intel-wired-lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; open list > > > <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; open list:XDP (eXpress Data Path) > > > <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ice: Fix logic of getting XSK pool > > > associated with Tx queue > > > > > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 14:00:01 +0200 > > > Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for this fix! I did exactly the same patch yesterday and > > > > it's already applied to bpf tree: > > > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220328142123.170157-5-maciej.fijalko > > > > wski > > > > @intel.com/T/#u > > > > > > > > Maciej > > > > > > Thanks for info... Nice human race condition ;-) > > > > > > I. > > > > I'm covering for Tony this week maintaining this tree. He let me know there > were a few patches you had to send Ivan and I was waiting on this one. If > I'm following correctly, this one will be dropped and the other ones are ready > to be sent now to net then? > > Yes, this one is beaten and the net tree already contains it[0]. > There are still 3 Ivan's fixes not applied yet: > * [1] > * [2] > * [3] > > I'm wondering if it's worth to pass them through dev-queue since they're > urgent and have been tested already in 2 companies? They could go directly > to -net and make it into RC1. > > > > > Alice. > > [0] > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/commit/?id= > 1ac2524de7b366633fc336db6c94062768d0ab03 > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220322142554.3253428-1- > ivecera@xxxxxxxxxx > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220325132524.1765342-1- > ivecera@xxxxxxxxxx > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220325132819.1767050-1- > ivecera@xxxxxxxxxx > > Thanks, > Al Yes, if you read my original message, I said to net =) I am the one that takes it from here and sends to net. I was asserting that his changes were done now and ready to be sent to net or if I was missing another patch he is working on before putting it up. Alice
