Re: [PATCH net v2 11/14] docs: netdev: add missing back ticks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 11/14] docs: netdev: add missing back ticks
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 20:34:21 -0700
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx, corbet@xxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrew@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220329050830.2755213-12-kuba@kernel.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0



On 3/28/2022 10:08 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

I think double back ticks are more correct. Add where they are missing.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>


Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
--
Florian

References:
- [PATCH net v2 00/14] docs: update and move the netdev-FAQ
  - From: Jakub Kicinski
- [PATCH net v2 11/14] docs: netdev: add missing back ticks
  - From: Jakub Kicinski

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH net v2 12/14] docs: netdev: call out the merge window in tag checking
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH net v2 13/14] docs: netdev: broaden the new vs old code formatting guidelines
Previous by thread: [PATCH net v2 11/14] docs: netdev: add missing back ticks
Next by thread: [PATCH net v2 05/14] docs: netdev: note that RFC postings are allowed any time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux