Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for kptr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 02:30:57AM IST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 8:56 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
> <memxor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This uses the __kptr and __kptr_ref macros as well, and tries to test
> > the stuff that is supposed to work, since we have negative tests in
> > test_verifier suite. Also include some code to test map-in-map support,
> > such that the inner_map_meta matches the kptr_off_tab of map added as
> > element.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c       |  20 ++
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c  | 194 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 214 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..688732295ce9
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +#include <test_progs.h>
> > +
> > +#include "map_kptr.skel.h"
> > +
> > +void test_map_kptr(void)
> > +{
> > +       struct map_kptr *skel;
> > +       char buf[24];
> > +       int key = 0;
> > +
> > +       skel = map_kptr__open_and_load();
> > +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "map_kptr__open_and_load"))
> > +               return;
> > +       ASSERT_OK(bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.hash_map), &key, buf, 0),
> > +                 "bpf_map_update_elem hash_map");
> > +       ASSERT_OK(bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.hash_malloc_map), &key, buf, 0),
> > +                 "bpf_map_update_elem hash_malloc_map");
>
>
> nit: it's quite messy and verbose, please do the operation outside of
> ASSERT_OK() and just validate error:
>
> err = bpf_map_update_elem(...);
> ASSERT_OK(err, "hash_map_update");
>
> And keep those ASSERT_XXX() string descriptors relatively short (see
> how they are used internally in ASSERT_XXX() macros).
>

Ok.

> > +       map_kptr__destroy(skel);
> > +}
>
> [...]
>
> > +
> > +extern struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(unsigned long *sp) __ksym;
> > +extern struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *
> > +bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc **p, int a, int b) __ksym;
> > +extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_release(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p) __ksym;
> > +
> > +static __always_inline
>
> nit: no need for __always_inline everywhere, just `static void` will
> do the right thing.
>

Ok, will drop.

> > +void test_kptr_unref(struct map_value *v)
> > +{
> > +       struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p;
> > +
> > +       p = v->unref_ptr;
> > +       /* store untrusted_ptr_or_null_ */
> > +       v->unref_ptr = p;
> > +       if (!p)
> > +               return;
> > +       if (p->a + p->b > 100)
> > +               return;
> > +       /* store untrusted_ptr_ */
> > +       v->unref_ptr = p;
> > +       /* store NULL */
> > +       v->unref_ptr = NULL;
> > +}
> > +
>
> [...]

--
Kartikeya



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux