On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 9:51 PM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:50:17 -0700 > Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 3:46 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Alexei, > > > > > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:12:05 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > That makes little sense. It's not an unusual merge conflict. > > > > Peter's endbr series conflict with Masami's fprobe. > > > > Peter has a trivial patch that fixes objtool warning. > > > > The question is how to land that patch. > > > > I think the best is for Linus to apply it after bpf-next->net-next gets > > > > merged. > > > > > > Peter has other concerns, please read the thread and consider them. > > > > Masami is an expert in kprobe. He copy pasted a bit of kprobe logic > > to make it into 'multi kprobe' (he calls it fprobe). > > I believe he knows what he's doing. > > Steven reviewed and tested that set. > > We've tested it as well and don't have any correctness or api concerns. > > Sorry, that's my mistake to not Ccing to arch maintainers for the arch > dependent patches. Let me update and send v13 for this fprobe series. No. Please read what I've said earlier.
