On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 5:30 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:13:28 -0800 Tadeusz Struk wrote: > > diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c > > index 4788f6b37053..6d45112322a0 100644 > > --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c > > +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c > > @@ -1649,6 +1649,16 @@ static int __ip6_append_data(struct sock *sk, > > skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IPV6); > > skb->ip_summed = csummode; > > skb->csum = 0; > > + > > + /* > > + * Check if there is still room for payload > > + */ > > TBH I think the check is self-explanatory. Not worth a banner comment, > for sure. > > > + if (fragheaderlen >= mtu) { > > + err = -EMSGSIZE; > > + kfree_skb(skb); > > + goto error; > > + } > > Not sure if Willem prefers this placement, but seems like we can lift > this check out of the loop, as soon as fragheaderlen and mtu are known. > > > /* reserve for fragmentation and ipsec header */ > > skb_reserve(skb, hh_len + sizeof(struct frag_hdr) + > > dst_exthdrlen); Just updating this boundary check will do? if (mtu < fragheaderlen || ((mtu - fragheaderlen) & ~7) + fragheaderlen < sizeof(struct frag_hdr)) goto emsgsize;