Re: [PATCH net] xdp: xdp_mem_allocator can be NULL in trace_mem_connect().

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 2022-03-03 14:59:47 [+0100], Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > Since the commit mentioned below __xdp_reg_mem_model() can return a NULL
>> > pointer. This pointer is dereferenced in trace_mem_connect() which leads
>> > to segfault. It can be reproduced with enabled trace events during ifup.
>> >
>> > Only assign the arguments in the trace-event macro if `xa' is set.
>> > Otherwise set the parameters to 0.
>> >
>> > Fixes: 4a48ef70b93b8 ("xdp: Allow registering memory model without rxq reference")
>> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Hmm, so before the commit you mention, the tracepoint wasn't triggered
>> at all in the code path that now sets xdp_alloc is NULL. So I'm
>> wondering if we should just do the same here? Is the trace event useful
>> in all cases?
>
> Correct. It says:
> |              ip-1230    [003] .....     3.053473: mem_connect: mem_id=0 mem_type=PAGE_SHARED allocator=0000000000000000 ifindex=2
>
>> Alternatively, if we keep it, I think the mem.id and mem.type should be
>> available from rxq->mem, right?
>
> Yes, if these are the same things. In my case they are also 0:
>
> |              ip-1245    [000] .....     3.045684: mem_connect: mem_id=0 mem_type=PAGE_SHARED allocator=0000000000000000 ifindex=2
> |        ifconfig-1332    [003] .....    21.030879: mem_connect: mem_id=0 mem_type=PAGE_SHARED allocator=0000000000000000 ifindex=3
>
> So depends on what makes sense that tp can be skipped for xa == NULL or
> remain with
>                __entry->mem_id         = rxq->mem.id;
>                __entry->mem_type       = rxq->mem.type;
> 	       __entry->allocator      = xa ? xa->allocator : NULL;
>
> if it makes sense.

Right, looking at the code again, the id is only assigned in the path
that doesn't return NULL from __xdp_reg_mem_model().

Given that the trace points were put in specifically to be able to pair
connect/disconnect using the IDs, I don't think there's any use to
creating the events if there's no ID, so I think we should fix it by
skipping the trace event entirely if xdp_alloc is NULL.

-Toke





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux