On Wed, 2022-03-02 at 17:13 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > First, "section_name" here is extremely confusing in the face of > bpf_program__section_name() which returns a very different thing for > BPF program. But I think we shouldn't need to do anything extra here. > Using bpf_map__name() and then bpf_object__find_map_by_name() should > just work (there is real_name special-handling for maps that start > with dot). If that real_name special handling doesn't work for > subskeletons, we should fix that special handling instead of adding a > special getter. That special handling did not do the right thing when I first tried it but I'll poke at it, if that's the preferred approach! Thanks, Delyan
