On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:56:37AM IST, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:44:01AM +0530, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:17:25AM IST, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:57 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 05:10:31PM IST, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > > Hi Kumar, > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > > > > > > > > > [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] > > > > > > > > > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Kumar-Kartikeya-Dwivedi/Fixes-for-bad-PTR_TO_BTF_ID-offset/20220301-150010 > > > > > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master > > > > > config: s390-randconfig-r021-20220301 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220301/202203011937.wMLpkfU3-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) > > > > > compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project d271fc04d5b97b12e6b797c6067d3c96a8d7470e) > > > > > > > > The same warning is emitted on clang for all existing definitions, so I can > > > > respin with a fix for the warning like we do for GCC, otherwise it can also > > > > be a follow up patch. > > > > > > Separate patch is fine. > > > How do you plan on fixing it? > > > What is __diag_ignore equivalent for clang? > > > > Hmm, looks like I'll have to add those in include/linux/compiler-clang.h. Quick > > local testing suggests it will work with _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored ..."). > > I have a diff that mirrors the GCC infrastructure, which should work for > this, feel free to copy it: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210310225240.4epj2mdmzt4vurr3@archlinux-ax161/ > > If you want to shut up the warning for all supported versions of clang, > switch 130000 for 110000 and __diag_clang_11() for __diag_clang_13(). > That's great, Nathan! I'll add your Signed-off-by to it. > Cheers, > Nathan -- Kartikeya
