On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 02:27:45PM -0800, Mykola Lysenko wrote:
> .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
> .matches = {
> - {6, "R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"},
> - {7, "R4_w=inv(id=1,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"},
> - {8, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"},
> - {9, "R4_w=inv(id=1,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"},
> - {10, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=510,var_off=(0x0; 0x1fe))"},
> - {11, "R4_w=inv(id=1,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"},
> - {12, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"},
> - {13, "R4_w=inv(id=1,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"},
> - {14, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f8))"},
> - {15, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4080,var_off=(0x0; 0xff0))"},
> + {6, "R3_w=scalar(umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"},
> + {7, "R4_w=scalar(id=1,umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"},
> + {8, "R4_w=scalar(umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"},
> + {9, "R4_w=scalar(id=1,umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"},
> + {10, "R4_w=scalar(umax=510,var_off=(0x0; 0x1fe))"},
> + {11, "R4_w=scalar(id=1,umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"},
> + {12, "R4_w=scalar(umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"},
> + {13, "R4_w=scalar(id=1,umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"},
> + {14, "R4_w=scalar(umax=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f8))"},
> + {15, "R4_w=scalar(umax=4080,var_off=(0x0; 0xff0))"},
Sorry for the later review.
Would "int" be more precise and less verbose than "scalar"?
