On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 12:35:02PM +0800, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: >> +disable_xck: >> + clk_disable(clock->xck); >> +disable_ick: >> + clk_disable(clock->ick); >> +err: >> + return ret; >> } > > I think disable_ick() / disable_xck() order are inverted ? Thanks, I will submit a v3 to solve it. Jiang