Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] Improve BPF test stability (related to perf events and scheduling)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2/28/22 7:39 PM, Mykola Lysenko wrote:
In send_signal, replace sleep with dummy cpu intensive computation
to increase probability of child process being scheduled. Add few
more asserts.

In find_vma, reduce sample_freq as higher values may be rejected in
some qemu setups, remove usleep and increase length of cpu intensive
computation.

In bpf_cookie, perf_link and perf_branches, reduce sample_freq as
higher values may be rejected in some qemu setups

Signed-off-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@xxxxxx>

LGTM with a few nits below.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>

---
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c       |  2 +-
  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/find_vma.c | 13 ++++++++++---
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c    |  4 ++--
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c        |  2 +-
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c      | 17 ++++++++++-------
  .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_send_signal_kern.c |  2 +-
  6 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
index cd10df6cd0fc..0612e79a9281 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static void pe_subtest(struct test_bpf_cookie *skel)
  	attr.type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE;
  	attr.config = PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK;
  	attr.freq = 1;
-	attr.sample_freq = 4000;
+	attr.sample_freq = 1000;
  	pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, -1, 0, -1, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
  	if (!ASSERT_GE(pfd, 0, "perf_fd"))
  		goto cleanup;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/find_vma.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/find_vma.c
index b74b3c0c555a..a0b68381cd79 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/find_vma.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/find_vma.c
@@ -30,12 +30,20 @@ static int open_pe(void)
  	attr.type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE;
  	attr.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES;
  	attr.freq = 1;
-	attr.sample_freq = 4000;
+	attr.sample_freq = 1000;
  	pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, 0, -1, -1, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
return pfd >= 0 ? pfd : -errno;
  }
+static bool find_vma_pe_condition(struct find_vma *skel)
+{
+	return skel->bss->found_vm_exec != 1 ||

In test_and_reset_skel(), we have following codes for reset/default values:
        skel->bss->found_vm_exec = 0;
        skel->data->find_addr_ret = -1;
        skel->data->find_zero_ret = -1;
        skel->bss->d_iname[0] = 0;

I think we should stick to them, so it would be good
to change
	skel->bss->found_vm_exec != 1
to
	skel->bss->found_vm_exec == 0

+		skel->data->find_addr_ret == -1 ||
+		skel->data->find_zero_ret != 0 ||

Change
	skel->data->find_zero_ret != 0
to
	skel->data->find_zero_ret == -1

The bpf program may set skel->data->find_zero_ret to
-ENOENT (-2)  or -EBUSY (-16) in which case we should
stop the iteration.

+		skel->bss->d_iname[0] == 0;
+}
+
  static void test_find_vma_pe(struct find_vma *skel)
  {
  	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
@@ -57,7 +65,7 @@ static void test_find_vma_pe(struct find_vma *skel)
  	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_perf_event"))
  		goto cleanup;
- for (i = 0; i < 1000000; ++i)
+	for (i = 0; i < 1000000000 && find_vma_pe_condition(skel); ++i)
  		++j;
test_and_reset_skel(skel, -EBUSY /* in nmi, irq_work is busy */);
@@ -108,7 +116,6 @@ void serial_test_find_vma(void)
  	skel->bss->addr = (__u64)(uintptr_t)test_find_vma_pe;
test_find_vma_pe(skel);
-	usleep(100000); /* allow the irq_work to finish */
  	test_find_vma_kprobe(skel);
find_vma__destroy(skel);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c
index 12c4f45cee1a..bc24f83339d6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static void test_perf_branches_hw(void)
  	attr.type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE;
  	attr.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES;
  	attr.freq = 1;
-	attr.sample_freq = 4000;
+	attr.sample_freq = 1000;
  	attr.sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK;
  	attr.branch_sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER | PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY;
  	pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, -1, 0, -1, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static void test_perf_branches_no_hw(void)
  	attr.type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE;
  	attr.config = PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK;
  	attr.freq = 1;
-	attr.sample_freq = 4000;
+	attr.sample_freq = 1000;
  	pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, -1, 0, -1, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
  	if (CHECK(pfd < 0, "perf_event_open", "err %d\n", pfd))
  		return;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c
index ede07344f264..224eba6fef2e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ void serial_test_perf_link(void)
  	attr.type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE;
  	attr.config = PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK;
  	attr.freq = 1;
-	attr.sample_freq = 4000;
+	attr.sample_freq = 1000;
  	pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, -1, 0, -1, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
  	if (!ASSERT_GE(pfd, 0, "perf_fd"))
  		goto cleanup;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c
index 776916b61c40..b1b574c7016a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c
@@ -4,11 +4,11 @@
  #include <sys/resource.h>
  #include "test_send_signal_kern.skel.h"
-int sigusr1_received = 0;
+static int sigusr1_received;
static void sigusr1_handler(int signum)
  {
-	sigusr1_received++;
+	sigusr1_received = 1;
  }
static void test_send_signal_common(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
@@ -40,9 +40,10 @@ static void test_send_signal_common(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
if (pid == 0) {
  		int old_prio;
+		volatile int volatile_variable = 0;

I think it is okay to use variable 'j' to be consistent with other
similar codes in selftests.

/* install signal handler and notify parent */
-		signal(SIGUSR1, sigusr1_handler);
+		ASSERT_NEQ(signal(SIGUSR1, sigusr1_handler), SIG_ERR, "signal");
close(pipe_c2p[0]); /* close read */
  		close(pipe_p2c[1]); /* close write */
@@ -63,9 +64,11 @@ static void test_send_signal_common(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
  		ASSERT_EQ(read(pipe_p2c[0], buf, 1), 1, "pipe_read");
/* wait a little for signal handler */
-		sleep(1);
+		for (int i = 0; i < 100000000 && !sigusr1_received; i++)
+			volatile_variable /= i + 1;
buf[0] = sigusr1_received ? '2' : '0';
+		ASSERT_EQ(sigusr1_received, 1, "sigusr1_received");
  		ASSERT_EQ(write(pipe_c2p[1], buf, 1), 1, "pipe_write");
/* wait for parent notification and exit */
[...]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux