If tcp_bpf_sendmsg is running during a tear down operation, psock may be
freed.
tcp_bpf_sendmsg()
tcp_bpf_send_verdict()
sk_msg_return()
tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir()
unlikely(!psock))
sk_msg_free()
The mem of msg has been uncharged in tcp_bpf_send_verdict() by
sk_msg_return(), and would be uncharged by sk_msg_free() again. When psock
is null, we can simply returning an error code, this would then trigger
the sk_msg_free_nocharge in the error path of __SK_REDIRECT and would have
the side effect of throwing an error up to user space. This would be a
slight change in behavior from user side but would look the same as an
error if the redirect on the socket threw an error.
This issue can cause the following info:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2136 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:155 inet_sock_destruct+0x13c/0x260
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__sk_destruct+0x24/0x1f0
sk_psock_destroy+0x19b/0x1c0
process_one_work+0x1b3/0x3c0
worker_thread+0x30/0x350
? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
kthread+0xe6/0x110
? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
</TASK>
Fixes: 604326b41a6f ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
index 1f0364e06619..7ed1e6a8e30a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
@@ -138,10 +138,9 @@ int tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir(struct sock *sk, struct sk_msg *msg,
struct sk_psock *psock = sk_psock_get(sk);
int ret;
- if (unlikely(!psock)) {
- sk_msg_free(sk, msg);
- return 0;
- }
+ if (unlikely(!psock))
+ return -EPIPE;
+
ret = ingress ? bpf_tcp_ingress(sk, psock, msg, bytes, flags) :
tcp_bpf_push_locked(sk, msg, bytes, flags, false);
sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
--
2.25.1
