On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 9:06 PM Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 5:35 PM Yan Zhu <zhuyan34@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Sysctl table is easier to read under its own module. > > "own module"? > What are you talking about? I'm sorry I didn't express it clearly. The meaning here is that the code of bpf syscall sysctl is moved to the bpf module I will fix it in v2 patch. > It's not "easier to read" and looks like a pointless churn.
