Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 00/10] Introduce unstable CT lookup helpers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Kartikeya,

sorry if i wasn't clear in my first message but just to be sure
we have no misunderstandings :)

.BTF sections work on s390x with linux-next and nf_conntrack as well if
the corresponding .BTF section is a part of the kernel module itself.
I tested it myself by building a linux-next kernel and testing it with a
KVM guest, i'm able to load nf_conntrack and it works.

In contrast, in the case where the corresponding .BTF section is separate
from the kernel module nf_conntrack, it fails with the message i
provided in the first email.

Therefore, my question is, does BTF for kernel modules work if the
corresponding BTF section is NOT a part of the kernel module but instead
is stored within the corresponding debuginfo file
/usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/*/kernel/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.ko.debug ?

Thanks
Regards
Alex


 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux