Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix a clang deprecated-declarations compilation error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2/17/22 1:59 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:40 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> wrote:

Build the kernel and selftest with clang compiler with LLVM=1,
   make -j LLVM=1
   make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf -j LLVM=1

I hit the following selftests/bpf compilation error:
   In file included from test_cpp.cpp:3:
   /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf.h:73:8:
     error: 'relaxed_core_relocs' is deprecated: libbpf v0.6+: field has no effect [-Werror,-Wdeprecated-declarations]
   struct bpf_object_open_opts {
          ^
   test_cpp.cpp:56:2: note: in implicit move constructor for 'bpf_object_open_opts' first required here
           LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
           ^
   /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:77:3: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_OPTS'
                   (struct TYPE) {                                             \
                   ^
   /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf.h:90:2: note: 'relaxed_core_relocs' has been explicitly marked deprecated here
           LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(0, 6, "field has no effect")
           ^
   /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:24:4: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE'
                   (LIBBPF_DEPRECATED("libbpf v" # major "." # minor "+: " msg))
                    ^
   /.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:19:47: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_DEPRECATED'
   #define LIBBPF_DEPRECATED(msg) __attribute__((deprecated(msg)))

There are two ways to fix the issue, one is to use GCC diagnostic ignore pragma, and the
other is to open code bpf_object_open_opts instead of using LIBBPF_OPTS.
Since in general LIBBPF_OPTS is preferred, the patch fixed the issue by
adding proper GCC diagnostic ignore pragmas.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>
---

Do you know why we see this only with Clang? Why GCC doesn't generate this?

Not a gcc internal expert. But I guess gcc didn't look into struct field deprecated attribute.

The following is a simpler reproducer. The structure initialization
in the code means the compiler needs to initialize each named field
with either default value (0) or provided value. If one of fields
is marked as deprecated, the compiler can emit warning message since
that field is accessed.

[$ ~/tmp3] cat t.cc
struct bpf_object_open_opts {
        long sz;
        const char *objname;
        int relax_maps;
        int relaxed_core_relocs __attribute__((deprecated("msg")));
        const char *pin_root_path;
};

void foo(void *);
int test(void) {
struct bpf_object_open_opts tmp = (struct bpf_object_open_opts) { .sz = 2, };
        foo(&tmp);
        return 0;
}

[$ ~/tmp3] clang++ -c -g t.cc -Wall -Werror
t.cc:1:8: error: 'relaxed_core_relocs' is deprecated: msg [-Werror,-Wdeprecated-declarations]
struct bpf_object_open_opts {
       ^
t.cc:11:43: note: in implicit move constructor for 'bpf_object_open_opts' first required here struct bpf_object_open_opts tmp = (struct bpf_object_open_opts) { .sz = 2, };
                                          ^
t.cc:5:41: note: 'relaxed_core_relocs' has been explicitly marked deprecated here
        int relaxed_core_relocs __attribute__((deprecated("msg")));
                                               ^
1 error generated.
[$ ~/tmp3] g++ -c -g t.cc -Wall -Werror
[$ ~/tmp3] g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 8.5.0 20210514 (Red Hat 8.5.0-3)
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

[$ ~/tmp3]



  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp
index 773f165c4898..19ad172036da 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp
@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
  /* SPDX-License-Identifier: (LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause) */
  #include <iostream>
+#pragma GCC diagnostic push
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-declarations"
  #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
+#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
  #include <bpf/bpf.h>
  #include <bpf/btf.h>
  #include "test_core_extern.skel.h"
--
2.30.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux