> > > But yeah, the main question is whether there is something preventing > > us from supporting multi-attach uprobe as well? It would be really > > great for USDT use case. > > Ah, for the USDT, it will be useful. But since now we will have "user-event" > which is faster than uprobes, we may be better to consider to use it. Any pointers? I'm not sure what "user-event" refers to. > > I'm not so sure how uprobes probes the target process, but maybe it has > to manage some memory pages and task related things. If we can split > those task-related part from struct uprobe software-breakpoint part, > it maybe easy to support multiple probe (one task-related part + multiple > software-breakpoint parts.) > > Thank you, > > -- > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
