Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/7] libbpf: split bpf_core_apply_relo()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 2:27 PM Mauricio Vásquez <mauricio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> BTFGen needs to run the core relocation logic in order to understand
> what are the types involved in a given relocation.
>
> Currently bpf_core_apply_relo() calculates and **applies** a relocation
> to an instruction. Having both operations in the same function makes it
> difficult to only calculate the relocation without patching the
> instruction. This commit splits that logic in two different phases: (1)
> calculate the relocation and (2) patch the instruction.
>
> For the first phase bpf_core_apply_relo() is renamed to
> bpf_core_calc_relo_insn() who is now only on charge of calculating the
> relocation, the second phase uses the already existing
> bpf_core_patch_insn(). bpf_object__relocate_core() uses both of them and
> the BTFGen will use only bpf_core_calc_relo_insn().
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vásquez <mauricio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Fontana <lorenzo.fontana@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Donato <leonardo.didonato@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

LGTM.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>

>  kernel/bpf/btf.c          | 13 +++++--
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c    | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c | 79 ++++++++++++---------------------------
>  tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++---
>  4 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
>

[...]




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux