Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>: On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 03:17:35 +0100 you wrote: > libbpf now has macros to access syscall arguments in an > architecture-agnostic manner, but unfortunately they have a number of > issues on non-Intel arches, which this series aims to fix. > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220201234200.1836443-1-iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > v1 -> v2: > * Put orig_gpr2 in place of args[1] on s390 (Vasily). > * Fix arm64, powerpc and riscv (Heiko). > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next,v5,01/10] selftests/bpf: Fix an endianness issue in bpf_syscall_macro test https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4fc49b51ab9d - [bpf-next,v5,02/10] libbpf: Add PT_REGS_SYSCALL_REGS macro https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c5a1ffa0da76 - [bpf-next,v5,03/10] selftests/bpf: Use PT_REGS_SYSCALL_REGS in bpf_syscall_macro https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3f928cab927c - [bpf-next,v5,04/10] libbpf: Fix accessing syscall arguments on powerpc https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f07f1503469b - [bpf-next,v5,05/10] libbpf: Fix riscv register names https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5c101153bfd6 - [bpf-next,v5,06/10] libbpf: Fix accessing syscall arguments on riscv https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/cf0b5b276923 - [bpf-next,v5,07/10] selftests/bpf: Skip test_bpf_syscall_macro:syscall_arg1 on arm64 and s390 https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/9e45a377f29b - [bpf-next,v5,08/10] libbpf: Allow overriding PT_REGS_PARM1{_CORE}_SYSCALL https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/60d16c5ccb81 - [bpf-next,v5,09/10] libbpf: Fix accessing the first syscall argument on arm64 https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fbca4a2f6497 - [bpf-next,v5,10/10] libbpf: Fix accessing the first syscall argument on s390 https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1f22a6f9f9a0 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
