[PATCH bpf-next v5 10/10] libbpf: Fix accessing the first syscall argument on s390

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On s390, the first syscall argument should be accessed via orig_gpr2
(see arch/s390/include/asm/syscall.h). Currently gpr[2] is used
instead, leading to bpf_syscall_macro test failure.

orig_gpr2 cannot be added to user_pt_regs, since its layout is a part
of the ABI. Therefore provide access to it only through
PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE_SYSCALL() by using a struct pt_regs flavor.

Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
index 928f85f7961c..0e0414801457 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
@@ -114,9 +114,19 @@
 
 #elif defined(bpf_target_s390)
 
+struct pt_regs___s390 {
+	unsigned long orig_gpr2;
+} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
+
 /* s390 provides user_pt_regs instead of struct pt_regs to userspace */
 #define __PT_REGS_CAST(x) ((const user_pt_regs *)(x))
 #define __PT_PARM1_REG gprs[2]
+#define PT_REGS_PARM1_SYSCALL(x) ({ \
+	_Pragma("GCC error \"PT_REGS_PARM1_SYSCALL() is not supported on s390, use PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE_SYSCALL() instead\""); \
+	0l; \
+})
+#define PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE_SYSCALL(x) \
+	BPF_CORE_READ((const struct pt_regs___s390 *)(x), orig_gpr2)
 #define __PT_PARM2_REG gprs[3]
 #define __PT_PARM3_REG gprs[4]
 #define __PT_PARM4_REG gprs[5]
-- 
2.34.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux