> On Feb 8, 2022, at 9:28 AM, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 10:26 PM Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Instead of BUG_ON(), fail gracefully and return orig_prog. >> >> Fixes: 1022a5498f6f ("bpf, x86_64: Use bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc") >> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 +++++- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c >> index 643f38b91e30..08e8fd8f954a 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c >> @@ -2380,7 +2380,11 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog) >> * >> * Both cases are serious bugs that we should not continue. > > I tweaked that comment a bit, since it's no longer accurate and > pushed to bpf-next. > Thanks! Thanks for the fix! I had that in mind initially, but forgot about it when I got to the keyboard. Song