> On Feb 8, 2022, at 9:28 AM, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 10:26 PM Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Instead of BUG_ON(), fail gracefully and return orig_prog.
>>
>> Fixes: 1022a5498f6f ("bpf, x86_64: Use bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc")
>> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>> index 643f38b91e30..08e8fd8f954a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>> @@ -2380,7 +2380,11 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>> *
>> * Both cases are serious bugs that we should not continue.
>
> I tweaked that comment a bit, since it's no longer accurate and
> pushed to bpf-next.
> Thanks!
Thanks for the fix! I had that in mind initially, but forgot about it
when I got to the keyboard.
Song
