Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 5:41 AM Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add tests for the newly added BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_syscall.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_kprobe_syscall.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_syscall.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kprobe_syscall.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_syscall.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0ac89c987024
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_syscall.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Hengqi Chen */
> +
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include <sys/prctl.h>
> +#include "test_kprobe_syscall.skel.h"
> +
> +void test_kprobe_syscall(void)
> +{
> +       struct test_kprobe_syscall *skel;
> +       int err;
> +
> +       skel = test_kprobe_syscall__open();
> +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_kprobe_syscall__open"))
> +               return;
> +
> +       skel->rodata->my_pid = getpid();
> +
> +       err = test_kprobe_syscall__load(skel);
> +       if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_kprobe_syscall__load"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +
> +       err = test_kprobe_syscall__attach(skel);
> +       if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_kprobe_syscall__attach"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +
> +       prctl(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
> +
> +       ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->option, 1, "BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL failed");
> +       ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->arg2, 2, "BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL failed");
> +       ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->arg3, 3, "BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL failed");
> +       ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->arg4, 4, "BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL failed");
> +       ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->arg5, 5, "BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL failed");
> +
> +cleanup:
> +       test_kprobe_syscall__destroy(skel);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kprobe_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kprobe_syscall.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..abd59c3d5b59
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kprobe_syscall.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Hengqi Chen */
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h>
> +#include "bpf_misc.h"
> +
> +const volatile pid_t my_pid = 0;
> +int option = 0;
> +unsigned long arg2 = 0;
> +unsigned long arg3 = 0;
> +unsigned long arg4 = 0;
> +unsigned long arg5 = 0;
> +
> +SEC("kprobe/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_prctl")
> +int BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL(prctl_enter, int opt, unsigned long a2,
> +                      unsigned long a3, unsigned long a4, unsigned long a5)
> +{
> +       pid_t pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
> +
> +       if (pid != my_pid)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       option = opt;
> +       arg2 = a2;
> +       arg3 = a3;
> +       arg4 = a4;
> +       arg5 = a5;
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +

Let's add all this into progs/bpf_syscall_macro.c and
prog_tests/test_bpf_syscall_macro.c, instead of adding a new selftest.
They are closely related anyways.

> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> --
> 2.30.2



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux