Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] Split bpf_sock dst_port field

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 12:55:16 +0100 you wrote:
> This is a follow-up to discussion around the idea of making dst_port in struct
> bpf_sock a 16-bit field that happened in [1].
> 
> v2:
> - use an anonymous field for zero padding (Alexei)
> 
> v1:
> - keep dst_field offset unchanged to prevent existing BPF program breakage
>   (Martin)
> - allow 8-bit loads from dst_port[0] and [1]
> - add test coverage for the verifier and the context access converter
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2,1/2] bpf: Make dst_port field in struct bpf_sock 16-bit wide
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4421a582718a
  - [bpf-next,v2,2/2] selftests/bpf: Extend verifier and bpf_sock tests for dst_port loads
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8f50f16ff39d

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux