Now that u[ret]probes can use name-based specification, it makes sense to add support for auto-attach based on SEC() definition. The format proposed is SEC("u[ret]probe//path/to/prog:[raw_offset|[function_name[+offset]]") For example, to trace malloc() in libc: SEC("uprobe//usr/lib64/libc.so.6:malloc") Auto-attach is done for all tasks (pid -1). Note that there is a backwards-compatibility issue here. Consider a BPF object consisting of a set of BPF programs, including a uprobe program. Because uprobes did not previously support auto-attach, it's possible that because the uprobe section name is not in auto-attachable form, overall BPF skeleton attach would now fail due to the failure of the uprobe program to auto-attach. So we need to handle the case of auto-attach failure where the form of the section name is not suitable for auto-attach without a complete attach failure. On surveying the code, bpf_program__attach() already returns -ESRCH in cases where no auto-attach function is supplied, so for consistency with that - and because that return value is less likely to collide with actual attach failures than -EOPNOTSUPP - it is used as the attach function return value signalling auto-attach is not possible. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c index eb95629..e2b4415 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c @@ -8581,6 +8581,7 @@ int bpf_program__set_log_buf(struct bpf_program *prog, char *log_buf, size_t log } static struct bpf_link *attach_kprobe(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie); +static struct bpf_link *attach_uprobe(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie); static struct bpf_link *attach_tp(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie); static struct bpf_link *attach_raw_tp(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie); static struct bpf_link *attach_trace(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie); @@ -8592,9 +8593,9 @@ int bpf_program__set_log_buf(struct bpf_program *prog, char *log_buf, size_t log SEC_DEF("sk_reuseport/migrate", SK_REUSEPORT, BPF_SK_REUSEPORT_SELECT_OR_MIGRATE, SEC_ATTACHABLE | SEC_SLOPPY_PFX), SEC_DEF("sk_reuseport", SK_REUSEPORT, BPF_SK_REUSEPORT_SELECT, SEC_ATTACHABLE | SEC_SLOPPY_PFX), SEC_DEF("kprobe/", KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE, attach_kprobe), - SEC_DEF("uprobe/", KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE), + SEC_DEF("uprobe/", KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE, attach_uprobe), SEC_DEF("kretprobe/", KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE, attach_kprobe), - SEC_DEF("uretprobe/", KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE), + SEC_DEF("uretprobe/", KPROBE, 0, SEC_NONE, attach_uprobe), SEC_DEF("tc", SCHED_CLS, 0, SEC_NONE), SEC_DEF("classifier", SCHED_CLS, 0, SEC_NONE | SEC_SLOPPY_PFX), SEC_DEF("action", SCHED_ACT, 0, SEC_NONE | SEC_SLOPPY_PFX), @@ -10525,6 +10526,64 @@ static long elf_find_func_offset(const char *binary_path, const char *name) } +/* Format of u[ret]probe section definition supporting auto-attach: + * u[ret]probe//path/to/prog:function[+offset] + * + * Many uprobe programs do not avail of auto-attach, so we need to handle the + * case where the format is uprobe/myfunc by returning NULL rather than an + * error. + */ +static struct bpf_link *attach_uprobe(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie) +{ + DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_uprobe_opts, opts); + char *func_name, binary_path[512]; + unsigned int raw_offset; + char *func, *probe_name; + struct bpf_link *link; + size_t offset = 0; + int n, err; + + opts.retprobe = str_has_pfx(prog->sec_name, "uretprobe/"); + if (opts.retprobe) + probe_name = prog->sec_name + sizeof("uretprobe/") - 1; + else + probe_name = prog->sec_name + sizeof("uprobe/") - 1; + + snprintf(binary_path, sizeof(binary_path), "%s", probe_name); + /* ':' should be prior to function+offset */ + func_name = strrchr(binary_path, ':'); + if (!func_name) { + pr_debug("section '%s' is old-style u[ret]probe/function, cannot auto-attach\n", + prog->sec_name); + return libbpf_err_ptr(-ESRCH); + } + func_name[0] = '\0'; + func_name++; + n = sscanf(func_name, "%m[a-zA-Z0-9_.]+%li", &func, &offset); + if (n < 1) { + err = -EINVAL; + pr_warn("uprobe name is invalid: %s\n", func_name); + return libbpf_err_ptr(err); + } + /* Is func a raw address? */ + if (n == 1 && sscanf(func, "%x", &raw_offset) == 1) { + free(func); + func = NULL; + offset = (size_t)raw_offset; + } + if (opts.retprobe && offset != 0) { + free(func); + err = -EINVAL; + pr_warn("uretprobes do not support offset specification\n"); + return libbpf_err_ptr(err); + } + opts.func_name = func; + + link = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_opts(prog, -1, binary_path, offset, &opts); + free(func); + return link; +} + struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_uprobe(const struct bpf_program *prog, bool retprobe, pid_t pid, const char *binary_path, @@ -12041,7 +12100,19 @@ int bpf_object__attach_skeleton(struct bpf_object_skeleton *s) *link = bpf_program__attach(prog); err = libbpf_get_error(*link); - if (err) { + switch (err) { + case 0: + break; + case -ESRCH: + /* -ESRCH is used as it is less likely to collide with other error + * cases in program attach while being consistent with the value + * returned by bpf_program__attach() where no auto-attach function + * is provided. + */ + pr_warn("auto-attach not supported for program '%s'\n", + bpf_program__name(prog)); + break; + default: pr_warn("failed to auto-attach program '%s': %d\n", bpf_program__name(prog), err); return libbpf_err(err); -- 1.8.3.1