Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, x86: remove unnecessary handling of BPF_SUB atomic op

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 1/27/22 11:48 AM, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> > Yep - BPF_SUB is also excluded in Documentation/networking/filter.rst,
> > plus the interpreter and verifier don't support it.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I was wondering about verifier specifically as well. Added a note to the
> commit log that verifier rejects BPF_SUB while applying, thanks!
> 

Thanks for the follow up Hou/Brendan LGTM as well. After its been
merged, but ACK from me as well.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux