Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] net/mlx5e: Avoid field-overflowing memcpy()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24 Jan 09:20, Kees Cook wrote:
In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time
field bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid
intentionally writing across neighboring fields.

Use flexible arrays instead of zero-element arrays (which look like they
are always overflowing) and split the cross-field memcpy() into two halves
that can be appropriately bounds-checked by the compiler.

We were doing:

	#define ETH_HLEN  14
	#define VLAN_HLEN  4
	...
	#define MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE (ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN)
	...
       struct mlx5e_tx_wqe      *wqe  = mlx5_wq_cyc_get_wqe(wq, pi);
	...
       struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg  *eseg = &wqe->eth;
       struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg *dseg = wqe->data;
	...
	memcpy(eseg->inline_hdr.start, xdptxd->data, MLX5E_XDP_MIN_INLINE);

target is wqe->eth.inline_hdr.start (which the compiler sees as being
2 bytes in size), but copying 18, intending to write across start
(really vlan_tci, 2 bytes). The remaining 16 bytes get written into
wqe->data[0], covering byte_count (4 bytes), lkey (4 bytes), and addr
(8 bytes).

struct mlx5e_tx_wqe {
       struct mlx5_wqe_ctrl_seg   ctrl;                 /*     0    16 */
       struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg    eth;                  /*    16    16 */
       struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg   data[];               /*    32     0 */

       /* size: 32, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
       /* last cacheline: 32 bytes */
};

struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg {
       u8                         swp_outer_l4_offset;  /*     0     1 */
       u8                         swp_outer_l3_offset;  /*     1     1 */
       u8                         swp_inner_l4_offset;  /*     2     1 */
       u8                         swp_inner_l3_offset;  /*     3     1 */
       u8                         cs_flags;             /*     4     1 */
       u8                         swp_flags;            /*     5     1 */
       __be16                     mss;                  /*     6     2 */
       __be32                     flow_table_metadata;  /*     8     4 */
       union {
               struct {
                       __be16     sz;                   /*    12     2 */
                       u8         start[2];             /*    14     2 */
               } inline_hdr;                            /*    12     4 */
               struct {
                       __be16     type;                 /*    12     2 */
                       __be16     vlan_tci;             /*    14     2 */
               } insert;                                /*    12     4 */
               __be32             trailer;              /*    12     4 */
       };                                               /*    12     4 */

       /* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 9 */
       /* last cacheline: 16 bytes */
};

struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg {
       __be32                     byte_count;           /*     0     4 */
       __be32                     lkey;                 /*     4     4 */
       __be64                     addr;                 /*     8     8 */

       /* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
       /* last cacheline: 16 bytes */
};

So, split the memcpy() so the compiler can reason about the buffer
sizes.

"pahole" shows no size nor member offset changes to struct mlx5e_tx_wqe
nor struct mlx5e_umr_wqe. "objdump -d" shows no meaningful object
code changes (i.e. only source line number induced differences and
optimizations).

Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Since this results in no binary differences, I will carry this in my tree
unless someone else wants to pick it up. It's one of the last remaining
clean-ups needed for the next step in memcpy() hardening.

applied to net-next-mlx5.

Thanks,
Saeed



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux