Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Add document for 'dst_port' of 'struct bpf_sock'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 08:24:27PM +0100, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > index b0383d371b9a..891a182a749a 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > @@ -5500,7 +5500,11 @@ struct bpf_sock {
> >  	__u32 src_ip4;
> >  	__u32 src_ip6[4];
> >  	__u32 src_port;		/* host byte order */
> > -	__u32 dst_port;		/* network byte order */
> > +	__u32 dst_port;		/* low 16-bits are in network byte order,
> > +				 * and high 16-bits are filled by 0.
> > +				 * So the real port in host byte order is
> > +				 * bpf_ntohs((__u16)dst_port).
> > +				 */
> >  	__u32 dst_ip4;
> >  	__u32 dst_ip6[4];
> >  	__u32 state;
> 
> I'm probably missing something obvious, but is there anything stopping
> us from splitting the field, so that dst_ports is 16-bit wide?
> 
> I gave a quick check to the change below and it seems to pass verifier
> checks and sock_field tests.
> 
> IDK, just an idea. Didn't give it a deeper thought.
> 
> --8<--
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 4a2f7041ebae..344d62ccafba 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -5574,7 +5574,8 @@ struct bpf_sock {
>  	__u32 src_ip4;
>  	__u32 src_ip6[4];
>  	__u32 src_port;		/* host byte order */
> -	__u32 dst_port;		/* network byte order */
> +	__u16 unused;
> +	__u16 dst_port;		/* network byte order */
This will break the existing bpf prog.

>  	__u32 dst_ip4;
>  	__u32 dst_ip6[4];
>  	__u32 state;
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index a06931c27eeb..c56b8ba82de5 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -8276,7 +8276,6 @@ bool bpf_sock_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
>  	case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, family):
>  	case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, type):
>  	case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, protocol):
> -	case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_port):
>  	case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_port):
>  	case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, rx_queue_mapping):
>  	case bpf_ctx_range(struct bpf_sock, src_ip4):
> @@ -8285,6 +8284,9 @@ bool bpf_sock_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
>  	case bpf_ctx_range_till(struct bpf_sock, dst_ip6[0], dst_ip6[3]):
>  		bpf_ctx_record_field_size(info, size_default);
>  		return bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(off, size, size_default);
> +	case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_port):
> +		bpf_ctx_record_field_size(info, sizeof(__u16));
> +		return bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(off, size, sizeof(__u16));
>  	}
> 
>  	return size == size_default;
> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 4a2f7041ebae..344d62ccafba 100644
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -5574,7 +5574,8 @@ struct bpf_sock {
>  	__u32 src_ip4;
>  	__u32 src_ip6[4];
>  	__u32 src_port;		/* host byte order */
> -	__u32 dst_port;		/* network byte order */
> +	__u16 unused;
> +	__u16 dst_port;		/* network byte order */
>  	__u32 dst_ip4;
>  	__u32 dst_ip6[4];
>  	__u32 state;



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux