Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/1] bpf: Add bpf_copy_from_user_remote to read a process VM given its PID.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 02:09, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> How would bpf prog know the pid of the python interpreter?
> Then how would it know the pids of the threads?
> I'm not against exposing find_get_task_by_vpid(), but
> we need to understand the real usage first.
> If we do end up exposing find_get_task_by_vpid(), it's probably
> best to do via refcnt-ed kfunc approach (unstable helpers).
> For example: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220114163953.1455836-7-memxor@xxxxxxxxx/

This is a simple but somewhat unrealistic example but hopefully it
will give the idea. Suppose we are tracing sys_kill on entry and that
we have an application that uses it to check if a process exists by
sending the 0 signal to its PID. During the handling of this event, we
might want to read a certain area of the VM (which we would have
identified a priori from user-space) of the process identified by the
PID passed to the syscall.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux