It seems inc_misses_counter() suffers from same issue fixed in
the commit d979617aa84d ("bpf: Fixes possible race in update_prog_stats()
for 32bit arches"):
As it can run while interrupts are enabled, it could
be re-entered and the u64_stats syncp could be mangled.
Fixes: 9ed9e9ba2337 ("bpf: Count the number of times recursion was prevented")
Signed-off-by: He Fengqing <hefengqing@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index 4b6974a195c1..5e7edf913060 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -550,11 +550,12 @@ static __always_inline u64 notrace bpf_prog_start_time(void)
static void notrace inc_misses_counter(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
struct bpf_prog_stats *stats;
+ unsigned int flags;
stats = this_cpu_ptr(prog->stats);
- u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp);
+ flags = u64_stats_update_begin_irqsave(&stats->syncp);
u64_stats_inc(&stats->misses);
- u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp);
+ u64_stats_update_end_irqrestore(&stats->syncp, flags);
}
/* The logic is similar to bpf_prog_run(), but with an explicit
--
2.25.1
