On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:01 PM Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 1/19/22 2:57 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > Use BTF-defined map definition in the documentation example.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/bpf/btf.rst | 21 +++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/btf.rst b/Documentation/bpf/btf.rst
> > index 1ebf4c5c7ddc..07165682da2b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/bpf/btf.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/bpf/btf.rst
> > @@ -565,18 +565,15 @@ A map can be created with ``btf_fd`` and specified key/value type id.::
> > In libbpf, the map can be defined with extra annotation like below:
> > ::
> >
> > - struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") btf_map = {
> > - .type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY,
> > - .key_size = sizeof(int),
> > - .value_size = sizeof(struct ipv_counts),
> > - .max_entries = 4,
> > - };
> > - BPF_ANNOTATE_KV_PAIR(btf_map, int, struct ipv_counts);
>
> There is another bpf_map_def in btf.rst.
> Maybe convert it as well? Especially considering it's an example of
> BTF enabled pretty printing.
My bad, not sure how I missed it while grepping. I'll convert that one
as well in v2.
